Silo buildings: A new image in the urban landscape
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i1155Keywords:
architectural interventions, industrial heritage preservation, silo buildings, urban regeneration, adaptive reuseAbstract
Silo buildings, traditionally used for storing bulk commodities such as grain, cement, and seeds, have become emblematic of industrial heritage while increasingly facing obsolescence in modern cities. Their cylindrical forms, dictated initially by utilitarian priorities, have made them prominent landmarks in urban and rural landscapes. With advancements in agricultural technology, shifts in logistics, and urban expansion, many silos lost their primary functions, leading to their abandonment or demolition. Recognizing the cultural, historical, and architectural significance of these structures, this study examines the potential of adaptive reuse—mainly through façade modifications and structural alterations—to transform silo buildings into vibrant elements of the contemporary urban fabric. A qualitative multiple-case study methodology was adopted to analyze four exemplary projects: Portland Towers, The Silo, Gemini Residence in Copenhagen, and Sugar City in Amsterdam. Data collection involved the review of architectural documentation, historical records, and visual media, with site observations and, where possible, stakeholder interviews. This approach enabled an in-depth exploration of the strategies employed to convert monumental, monolithic silos into fully functional environments. Central to these transformations were façade interventions—such as the introduction of windows, balconies, and new cladding materials—that humanized previously austere exteriors and improved interior light and ventilation. Structural additions and interior reconfigurations were also critical, helping silo buildings comply with modern building standards and accommodate a range of new functions, including offices, residences, and cultural venues. Findings highlight how carefully balanced preservation and innovation can conserve industrial authenticity while meeting contemporary urban needs. These projects illustrate how adaptive reuse revitalizes obsolete buildings and contributes to urban regeneration by attracting economic investment, enhancing local identity, and promoting sustainability through the conservation of embodied energy. Moreover, preserving a silo’s cylindrical core while introducing modern features fosters a sense of continuity between past and present, reinforcing communal memory. Ultimately, the case studies underscore adaptive reuse as a practical, culturally sensitive pathway for reimagining silo buildings—one that merges historical significance, architectural creativity, and sustainable development to produce dynamic new landmarks in evolving urban landscapes.
Metrics
References
- Affleck, J., & Kvan, T. (2008). A virtual community as the context for discursive interpretation: A role in cultural heritage engagement. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 14(3), 268 280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250801953751
- ArchDaily. (2017). The Silo / Cobe. Retrieved August 15, 2024, from https://www.archdaily.com/874698/the-silo-cobe
- Archello. (2005). Gemini Residences / Frosilo. Retrieved May 5, 2024, from https://archello.com/project/gemini-residences-frosilo
- Ashworth, G. (2011). Preservation, conservation and heritage: Approaches to the past in the present through the built environment. Asian Anthropology, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2011.10552601
- Barbara, J., Koenitz, H., & Bakk, Á. K. (2021). The ethics of virtual reality interactive digital narratives in cultural heritage. In International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling (pp. 288-292). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92300-6_27
- Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they're built. Penguin Books.
- Brooker, G., & Stone, S. (2019). Re-readings: 2: Interior Architecture and the principles of remodelling existing buildings (1st ed.). RIBA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367814601
- Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. (2011). Adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Structural Survey, 29(5), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630801111182439
- Cantell, S. F. (2005). The adaptive reuse of historic industrial buildings: Regulation barriers, best practices and case studies (Master's thesis). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
- Carmona, M. (2021). Public places urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158457
- COBE. (2017). The Silo. Retrieved August 7, 2024, from https://www.cobe.dk/projects/the-silo
- Copenhagen Architecture. (2016). Gemini Residence by MVRDV. Retrieved July 9, 2024, from https://copenhagenarchitecture.dk/gemini-residence-by-mvrdv/
- Couch, C., Fraser, C., & Percy, S. (Eds.). (2008). Urban regeneration in Europe. John Wiley & Sons.
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Denzin, N. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543
- DGA Architects. (2014). Portland Siloerne. Retrieved September 21, 2024, from https://dga.dk/project/portland-siloerne/
- Douet, J. (2012). Industrial heritage re-tooled: The TICCIH guide to industrial heritage conservation. Routledge.
- Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080458519
- Edwards, J. A., & Llurdés i Coit, J. (1996). Mines and quarries: Industrial heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 23(2), 341-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(95)00067-4
- Feilden, B. M. (2003). Conservation of historic buildings. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080502915
- Fernández-Fernández, M. V., Marcelo, V., Valenciano, J. B., & López-Díez, F. J. (2017). History, construction characteristics and possible reuse of Spain’s network of silos and granaries. Land Use Policy, 63, 298-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.01.017
- FIABCI. (2012). Prix d’Excellence. Runner up: SugarCity Silos (The Netherlands). Retrieved July 8, 2024, from https://fiabciprix.com/past-winner/?id=134
- Flick, U. (2022). An introduction to qualitative research. Sage Publications.
- Frearson, A. (2015). Frosilo apartments offer a "great combination of old and new" says MVRDV's Jacob van Rijs. Dezeen. Retrieved August 3, 2024, from https://www.dezeen.com/2015/08/14/frosilo-apartments-offer-great-combination-old-new-mvrdv-movie-jacob-van-rijs-copenhagen/
- Griffiths, A. (2017). Cobe transforms Copenhagen grain silo into apartment block with faceted facades. Dezeen. Retrieved September 3, 2024, from https://www.dezeen.com/2017/06/28/cobe-transforms-copenhagen-grain-silo-apartment-block-faceted-facades/
- Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2013). Revitalising historic urban quarters. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080516271
- Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage Publications.
- Jokilehto, J. (2017). A history of architectural conservation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315636931
- Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
- Langston, C., Wong, F. K., Hui, E. C., & Shen, L. Y. (2008). Strategic assessment of building adaptive reuse opportunities in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 43(10), 1709-1718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.10.017
- Logothetis, S., Delinasiou, A., & Stylianidis, E. (2015). Building information modelling for cultural heritage: a review. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2, 177-183. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W3-177-2015
- Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
- Martinat, S., Navratil, J., Hollander, J. B., Trojan, J., Klapka, P., Klusacek, P., & Kalok, D. (2018). Re-reuse of regenerated brownfields: Lessons from an Eastern European post-industrial city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 536-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.313
- Meerow, S., Newell, J. P., & Stults, M. (2016). Defining urban resilience: A review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 147, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011
- Mies Award. (2007). Gemini Residence. Retrieved July 18, 2024, from https://miesarch.com/work/1487
- MVRDV. (2005). Frøsilo. Retrieved July 11, 2024, from https://www.mvrdv.com/projects/143/fr%C3%B8silo
- NCC Property Development. (2014). Portland Towers. Retrieved September 21, 2024, from https://www.ncc.com/our-projects/portland-towers/
- Palmer, M. (1998). Industrial archaeology: Principles and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203022993
- Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage Publications.
- Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2012). Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: A survey of 19th and 20th century theories. In Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference Reinventing Architecture and Interiors: the past, the present and the future (RIE).
- Plevoets, B., & Van Cleempoel, K. (2019). Adaptive reuse of the built heritage: Concepts and cases of an emerging discipline. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315161440
- Rautenberg, M. (2012). Industrial heritage, regeneration of cities and public policies in the 1990s: elements of a French/British comparison. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 18(5), 513-525. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2011.637945
- Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In P. Roberts & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban Regeneration: A Handbook (pp. 9–36). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446219980.n2
- Schittich, C. (Ed.). (2012). Building in existing fabric: Refurbishment, extensions, new design. Walter de Gruyter.
- Shipley, R., Utz, S., & Parsons, M. (2006). Does adaptive reuse pay? A study of the business of building renovation in Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 12(6), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527250600940181
- Stratton, M. (2003). Industrial buildings: Conservation and regeneration. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203362471
- SugarCity. (2007). About SugarCity. Retrieved July 17, 2024, from https://www.sugarcity.com/en/about-sugarcity/
- The Housing Agency. (2024). Sustainable Compact Development - International Case Study Analysis. Retrieved November 7, 2024, from https://www.housingagency.ie/sites/default/files/2024-11/Sustainable_Compact_Development_International_Case_Study_Analysis.pdf
- UNESCO. (2011). Recommendation on the historic urban landscape. UNESCO. Retrieved April 17, 2024, from https://whc.unesco.org/uploads/activities/documents/activity-638-98.pdf
- UNESCO. (2013). New life for historic cities: The historic urban landscape approach explained. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
- Wong, L. (2017). Adaptive Reuse: Extending the Lives of Buildings. Birkhäuser.
- World Aluminium. (2007). Sugar City Silos. Green Building. Retrieved June 27, 2024, from https://greenbuilding.world-aluminium.org/benefits/flexible/sugar-city-silos/
- Xie, P. F. (2015). Industrial heritage tourism (Vol. 43). Channel View Publications.
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
- Yung, E. H., & Chan, E. H. (2012). Critical social sustainability factors in urban conservation: The case of the Central Police Station Compound in Hong Kong. Facilities, 30(9/10), 396-416. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771211235224
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zeynep Kerem Öztürk, Ahmet Kurnaz
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.