Hybrid space as a conceptual framework for adaptation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2020.v1i1001Keywords:
adaptation, adaptive reuse, culture, hybride space, hybridity, identityAbstract
Adaptive reuse is a common formula for reliving life in spaces that are no longer used for their original function, whether through physical adjustments or by incorporating virtual environments into space to Create hybrid spaces with a new dimension in which the data of memory, culture and space identity interact. Although the trends of the studies vary in their approach to deal with the concept of adapting architectural spaces, they remain in the same theme that the process of space adaptation is seen to be based on either one or the other, Oblivious to the fact that the process of building adaptation generates tension and creates hybrid spaces which belong to neither. Thus, the studies that focused on this subject does not reach the creation of a clear and specific theoretical framework for adapting architecture to changing cultural and social requirements and desires. This research attempts to examine the possibility of investing the concept of hybrid to consider different dimensions of architectural adaptation. The relevance of hybridity theory to understanding architectural adaptation is a subject that has hardly been explored. An objective of this research is to investigate this research gap represented of absence of specialized studies help to understand the relationship between the concept of hybrid and architectural adaptation and lack of the proposed concepts that accommodate new patterns of adaptation to preserve more than one characteristic (perhaps in conflict) within the original space. In light of this, the research problem is represented in the absence of a clear and comprehensive theoretical framework that enables the identification of forms of adaptation that respond to changing cultural and social requirements and desires. Hence, this research seeks to combine Bhabha's concept of hybrids and adaptation of architecture to build a clear and comprehensive perception of this concept, by using architectural studies that dealt with these subjects.
Metrics
References
- Al-Juboori, U. A., & Mustafa, F. A. (2014). Assessing the efficiency of functional performance of shopping malls in the Kingdom of Bahrain. International Transaction Journal of Engineering, Management, and Applied Sciences and Technologies, 5(3), 143-165.
- Al-Nijaidi, H, R. (1985). Flexibility in the Design of Buildings (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford Polytechnic).
- Alsayyad, N. (2001). Hybrid Urbanism, Identity Discourse and the Built Environment, Praeger, London
- Bartel, Marvin, (2014) "Elements and Principles of Design". IncredibleArt.org. Retrieved 1 Dec. 2018.
- Bhabha H. 1994. The Location of Culture. London, UK: Routledge
- Bhabha, H.K. (2006). Cultural Diversity and Cultural Differences. in The Post-Colonial Studies Reader, B. Ashcroft et al (eds). Routledge: New York: 155 – 157.
- Casey, E. S. (1997). How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena. In S. Feld, & K. H. Basso, Senses of place (pp. 13-52). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
- Castells, Manuel. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers.
- Chan Thomas. (2010). Rethinking space + place: negotiating a social realm between mobile technology and architecture. Master of Architecture.
- Cicognani, A. (1996). On the linguistic nature of cyberspace and virtual communities. Virtual reality, 3(1), 16-24. Retrieved October 27, 2009, from: http://fragment.nl/mirror/various/Cicognani_1996.html
- Creswell. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2007).
- Desai, M., Miki D and Jon L. (2011). “The Bungalow in Twentieth Century India: The Cultural Expression of Changing Ways of Life and Aspirations in the Domestic Architecture of Colonial and Post-Colonial Society”, Ashgate, UK. All photographs are by Miki Desai.
- Douglas, J. (2006). Building Adaptation (2nd edition), London: Elsevier.
- Dyson, F. (1998). “Space,” “being,” and other: fictions in the domain of the virtual. In J. Beckmann, The virtual dimension: architecture, representation, and crash culture (pp. 26-45). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
- E.B. Boyd (2009). Telling the story of Chinese-Americans. Retrieved December 24, 2020, from: https://paw.princeton.edu/article/telling-story-chinese-americans
- Guggenheim, M. (2009). Building memory: Architecture, networks and users. Memory Studies, 2(1), 39–53.
- Guignery V. (2011). Introduction: hybridity, why it still matters hybridity: forms and figures in literature and the visual arts.
- Haq, S. and Girotto, S., (2003) Abillity and Intelligibility, Wayfinding and environmental, proceedings of the 4th International space syntax symposium, London, England.
- Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time: a translation of sein und zeit (J. Stambaugh trans.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Hernández F .(2010). Bhabha for Architects
- Hillier, B. (2007). Space is the machine: a configurational theory of architecture. London: Space Syntax Laboratory.
- Huddart D (2018). Homi K. Bhabha. Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved December 30, 2020, from: https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780190221911/obo-9780190221911-0057.xml
- Huyssen, A. (1995). Twilight Memories: Marking time in a Culture of Amnesia. Routledge: London.
- ICOMOS, 2013. The Burra Charter, Austria: Burwood.
- Jagannath T, (2018). Edward Soja’s Theories of Urban Space
- Jencks, Charles. (1993). Architecture Today. Academy Editions, London.
- Kohler, N. and Hassler, U. (2002), “The building stock as a research object”, Building Research & Information, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 226-36.
- Kincaid, David. (2002). Adapting Buildings for Changing Uses Guidelines for Change of Use Refurbishment. First Ed, Spon Press, London.
- Lee, Michael Soon. (2018).https://www.ethnoconnect.com/articles/1-what-is-cultural-diversity
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith). Cambridge: Blackwell.
- Loveday T. (2008). Construction, the Third Space of Architecture. Society of Architectural Historians of Australia and New Zealand Conference 2008
- Low, S. M., & Smith, N. (Eds.). (2006). Introduction: The Imperative of Public Space, in the politics of public space. New York: Routledge.
- Lukacs, J. (1970). The Bourgeois Interior, American Scholar 39, no. 4: 620-621.
- Miles & Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1994); Zina O’Leary, The Essential Guide to Doing Your Research Project (Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2010).
- Nissen, y. (2008). Urban Transformation: From Public and Private Space to Spaces of Hybrid Character. Sociologicky časopis/Czech Sociological Review, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 1129-1149.
- Nora, P. (1989). Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire, in Representations: Special Issue: Memory and Counter-Memory, No. 26, Spring 1989. University of California, Press: Berkeley: pp.7 – 24.
- Peterson, K. H., and Rutherford, A. (2006). Fossil Psyche, in the post colonial studies reader, B. Ashcroft et al (eds). Routledge: New York: 139 – 142.
- Pluta, Katarzyna. (2016). Public hybrid spaces as a component of contemporary cities. A: Virtual City and Territory. "Back to the Sense of the City: International Monograph Book". Barcelona: Centre de Política de Sòl i Valoracions. p. 157-172
- Ridhika Naidoo. (2009). Maya Lin: museum of chinese in america opens september 22. Retrieved December 24, 2020, from: https://www.designboom.com/architecture/maya-lin-museum-of-chinese-in-america-opens-september-22/
- Sargın G, Savas A, (2011) Dialectical urbanism: Tactical instruments in urban design education
- Schulz, Norberg C. (1971). Existence, space and architecture. New York: Praeger.
- Sennett, R. (2008). Capitalism and the City: Globalization, Flexibility, and Indifference. In Cities of Europe: Changing Contexts, Local Arrangements, and the Challenge to Urban Cohesion (pp. 109-122). Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
- Steeds, L. (2014). Flexible Workspaces for Flexible Workers. Retrieved December 24, 2018, from http://popupcity.net/flexible-workspaces-for-flexible-workers/
- The Dreaming Wall. Collective Buzz in Town. — Conceptual Devices. (n.d.). Retrieved December 28, 2018, from http://www.conceptualdevices.com/2009/01/dreaming-wall.
- Undertaking Acquisition: Chronicles of our Time. (n.d.). Retrieved December 28, 2018, from https://www.christinelieu.com/room-202-archival-library-of-found-treasures/.
- YZ Works, Manchester’s newest hybrid co-workspace to launch in August - Invest in Manchester. (n.d.). Retrieved December 24, 2018, from https://www.investinmanchester.com/latest-news/2017/7/12/xyz-works-manchesters-newest-hybrid-co-work-space-to-launch-in-august-a2494
- Zecc Architecten | Studio Heldergroen Haarlem. (n.d.). Retrieved December 24, 2018, from https://www.arthitectural.com/zecc-architecten-studio-heldergroen-haarlem/
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2021-01-01 (2)
- 2020-12-29 (1)
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture & Planning
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
