A morphological framework for delineating character areas in a coastal town: The case of Görele, Türkiye
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2026.v7i2212Keywords:
character area delineation, historico-geographical approach, rural-to-urban transect, urban densityAbstract
Urban morphology has long sought to translate the historical, environmental, and built-form structure of settlements into legible units that planning can act on. In practice, however, the connection between morphological analysis and planning has remained limited, particularly in topographically differentiated small towns where standard density controls fail to fully address the distinct character of areas that are formed through topography, historical development, and built form. This paper develops a method for delineating character areas within a historico-geographical framework that is applicable to planning practice. The method synthesizes three groups of analysis: historical development, natural environmental structure, and built form and land use, to delineate different character areas of the urban landscape. The rural-to-urban transect was then applied as a secondary assessment to question the character area classification. The method is applied to Görele, a small coastal town in northeastern Türkiye, selected for its topography and traceable urban development history since the start of the Republican era in 1923. After the synthesis, nine character areas are defined in Görele, each shaped by a specific overlay of development history, natural setting, plot pattern, density, and building form. Non-parametric tests confirm that the areas differ significantly in plot area, ground space index, floor area ratio, and number of storeys. A Spearman rank correlation along the main rural-to-urban sequence shows that plot size decreases and density values increase toward the urban core, but areas with similar density values can differ substantially in plot pattern, street structure, and historical depth. The findings show that character area delineation provides a more differentiated basis for planning than density categories alone and identifies areas where high-density development has occurred without adequate integration with the urban context. In coastal towns shaped by constraining topography and historical development, this approach can guide density control toward more adaptive and contextual urban planning.
Downloads
References
An, X., & Gu, K. (2018). Urban intensification and the character of urban landscape: A morphological perspective. International Journal of Architectural and Environmental Engineering, 12(9), 898-902.
Arat, M. (2023). Morphological regionalization. Springer.
Arslan, M. (1973). Görele coğrafya, tarih, folklor, yönetim. San Matbaası.
Aydin, S., Çelebioğlu, B., & Aytuğ, A. (2024). Morphological analysis of historical urban landscape through heritage transect: A computational model. Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 9, 354-364.
Balamir, M. (1975). Kat mülkiyeti ve kentleşmemiz. ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 295-319.
Bilir, A. (2001). Geçmişten günümüze tüm yönleriyle Görele. Simurg Yayınları.
Birkhamshaw, A. J., & Whitehand, J. W. R. (2012). Conzenian urban morphology and the character areas of planners and residents. Urban Design International, 17(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.22
Boyko, D., Zuev, A., & Parygin, D. (2021). Land plot data usage for urban transect zones delimitation in case of Tula. In XXVIII International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF 2021): Urban form and the sustainable and prosperous cities.
Conzen, M. R. G. (1969). Alnwick, Northumberland: A study in town-plan analysis (2nd ed.). Institute of British Geographers.
Conzen, M. R. G. (1988). Morphogenesis, morphological regions and secular human agency in the historic townscape, as exemplified by Ludlow. In D. Denecke & G. Shaw (Eds.), Urban historical geography: Recent progress in Britain and Germany (pp. 253-272). Cambridge University Press.
Duany, A., & Plater-Zyberk, E. (2003). The SmartCode and manual. New Urban Publications.
Emecen, F. M. (2020). Karadeniz kıyı kentleri tarihi (1st ed.). Turkuvaz Kitap.
Emecen, F. M., Yüksel, A., & Keskin, İ. (2019). Görele tarihi. Görele Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları.
Fan, Y., Zou, H., Zhao, T., Fan, B., & Cheng, Y. (2025). Typological mapping of urban landscape spatial characteristics from the perspective of morphometrics. Land, 14(9), 1854. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14091854
Fleischmann, M., Feliciotti, A., Romice, O., & Porta, S. (2022). Methodological foundation of a numerical taxonomy of urban form. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 49(4), 1283-1299. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083211059835
Hall, P. (2008). The form-based development plan: Bridging the gap between theory and practice in urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 12(1), 77-95.
Han, S. (2021). The use of transects for resilient design: Core theories and contemporary projects. Landscape Ecology, 36(5), 1567-1582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-020-01172-9
Jachimowicz, A. M. (2022). Morphology of Warsaw city structure using urban indexes and GIS tools. Land, 11(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010135
Kropf, K. (2009). Aspects of urban form. Urban Morphology, 13(2), 105-120.
Kropf, K. (2011). Morphological investigations: Cutting into the substance of urban form. Built Environment, 37(4), 393-408.
Kropf, K. (2013a). Evolution and urban form: Staking out the ground for a more mature theory. Urban Morphology, 17(2), 136-149.
Kropf, K. (2013b). Ambiguity in the definition of built form. Urban Morphology, 18(1), 41-57.
Larkham, P. J., & Morton, N. (2011). Drawing lines on maps: Morphological regions and planning practices. Urban Morphology, 15(2), 133-151.
Monteiro, C., & Pinho, P. (2022). Comparing approaches in urban morphology. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 15(4), 491_518. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2021.1936602
Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology, 1(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v1i1.4047
Musard, C. (2023, July 10). Theorizing the rural_urban transect. CNU. https://www.cnu.org/publicsquare/2023/07/06/theorizing-rural-urban-transect
Oliveira, V. (2006). The morphological dimension of municipal plans. Urban Morphology, 10(2), 101-113. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v10i2.3929
Oliveira, V., & Yaygın, M. A. (2022). The concept of the morphological region: Developments and prospects. Urban Morphology, 24(1), 35-52.
Peck, J., Theodore, N., & Brenner, N. (2009). Neoliberal urbanism: Models, moments, mutations. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 29(1), 49-66.
Şengül, H. T. (2009). Kentsel çelişki ve siyaset: Kapitalist kentleşme süreçlerinin eleştirisi. İmge Kitabevi.
Talen, E. (2002). Help for urban planning: The transect strategy. Journal of Urban Design, 7(3), 293-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357480022000039349
Talen, E. (2023). Transect-based coding: A methodology. In H. Kamalipour, P. Aelbrecht, & N. Peimani (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of urban design research methods (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003168621
Tekeli, İ. (1994). Şehir planlama mimarlık üzerine sürülen bir krema değildir. Planlama, 10-21.
Turkish Statistical Institute. (2025). Population of province/district centers and towns/villages by province and district [Data set]. TurkStat Data Portal. https://veriportali.tuik.gov.tr/tr/databrowser/tuik/TR,DF_ADNKS_T22,1.1
Ünlü, T. (2026). İdeallerin Kenti'nden parçalanan Kent'e: Türkiye kentlerinde değişim ve dönüşüm. In A. Gürün & P. Çobanyılmaz (Eds.), Cumhuriyetin 100. yılında planlama. İdealKent Yayınları.
Vartholomaios, A. (2025). Detection and clustering of urban form types with machine learning: Insights into Thessaloniki's urban planning and evolution. Computational Urban Science, 5(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-025-00206-9
Whitehand, J. W. R. (2005). Understanding and shaping urban landscape character. Urban Morphology, 9(2), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v9i2.5139
Whitehand, J. W. R., & Morton, N. J. (2004). Urban morphology and planning: The case of fringe belts. Cities, 21(4), 275-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2004.04.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Beyza Karadeniz, Yelda Aydın Türk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
