Designing for experience: Exploring user-centered strategies in Selgascano’s architecture
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i3180Keywords:
color, context, material, SelgasCano, user experience, biophiliaAbstract
The production of space is a multidimensional and complex process that encompasses emotion, knowledge, intuition, foresight, and experience. When designing, architects consider interpersonal interactions and human-space relationships to create scenes suitable for the anticipated actions and experiences within a space. People, in turn, are the ones who experience spaces. Many researchers and architects focus on human-space interaction in architecture. Among these architects, the SelgasCano architecture office, founded in 1998 by Jose Selgas and Lucia Cano, places user experience at the center of its designs, aiming to create spaces that are not only functional but also places that users embrace and enjoy. Within this scope, the literature on human–space interaction was reviewed, and four key themes related to user experience in SelgasCano’s architectural approach were identified. Four projects in which SelgasCano was considered to reflect these themes most clearly (Silicon House, SelgasCano Architecture Office, Second Home London Office, and Second Home Hollywood Office) were examined. The study reveals that SelgasCano systematically integrates context, biophilia, material, and color as core design components that frame and enrich user experience across their architectural projects. The findings reveal that SelgasCano’s architecture positions user experience at the core of the design process, integrating sensory, emotional, and cognitive dimensions to create dynamic and engaging environments. The study concludes that user-centered and biophilic design strategies significantly contribute to enhancing spatial quality and human–space interaction. In this regard, examining and further developing design approaches that prioritize user experience is of critical importance for generating innovative and human-centered solutions in architectural practice.
Downloads
References
ArchDaily. (2013). Silicon House/Selgas Cano. https://www.archdaily.com/326188/silicon-house-selgas-cano (Access date: 07.09.2025)
ArchDaily. (2015). Second Home London Office. https://www.archdaily.com/769707/second-home-london-office-selgascano (Access date: 07.09.2025)
ArchDaily. (2019). Second Home Hollywood Office. https://www.archdaily.com/928819/second-home-hollywood-office-selgascano (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Architect Magazine. (n.d.). Second Home. https://www.architectmagazine.com/project-gallery/second-home_o (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Arkitektuel. (n.d.). Silikon Ev. https://www.arkitektuel.com/silikon-ev/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Ashour, A., A. Proctor, C., & M. Rohn, M. (2025). Neuroarchitecture and mental health: The role of sustainable building materials in cognitive and emotional well-being. New Environmentally-Friendly Materials, 4(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.55121/nefm.v4i1.431
Augé, M. (2016) Yok-yerler: Üstmodernliğin antropolojisine giriş. Daimon.
Baldwin, E. (2019). “Architecture is about human experience”: Diego Cano-Lasso on designing with nature in Los Angeles. ArchDaily. https://www.archdaily.com/927765/architecture-is-about-human-experience-diego-cano-lasso-on-designing-with-nature-in-los-angeles (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Beery, T. H., & Wolf-Watz, D. (2014). Nature to place: Rethinking the environmental connectedness perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 198-205.
Bragg, E. A. (1996). Towards ecological self: Deep ecology meets constructionist self-theory. Journal of environmental psychology, 16(2), 93-108.
Callaghan, M. (2015). Interior design strategies for nature-based features to support stress reduction in knowledge workers. In Innovation: Shifting Ground. EDRA.
Chawla, L. (1999). Life paths into effective environmental action. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(1), 15-26.
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and an operational definition. Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature, 45-65.
Coelho, C. (2013). Designing and assessing the living experience from brief to use. In Envisioning Architecture: Design, Evaluation, Communication-Proceedings of the 11th conference of the European Architectural Envisioning Association (pp. 25-28).
Davis, J. L., Green, J. D., & Reed, A. (2009). Interdependence with the environment: Commitment, interconnectedness, and environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(2), 173-180.
Dezeen. (2014). SelgasCano completes Second Home workspace featuring an orange tunnel and a “flying table”. https://www.dezeen.com/2014/12/08/second-home-selgascano-london-office-orange-tunnel-flying-table/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Dezeen. (2017). SelgasCano adds roof extension with pools and plants to Second Home offices in London. https://www.dezeen.com/2017/12/20/selgascano-roof-extension-terrace-second-home-offices-ponds-planting-london-uk/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Dezeen. (2019a). Second Home Hollywood by SelgasCano adds 6,500 plants to former Los Angeles car park. https://www.dezeen.com/2019/11/05/second-home-hollwood-selgascano-los-angeles/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Dezeen. (2019b). SelgasCano designs “most ambitious and bold” Second Home for Los Angeles. https://www.dezeen.com/2019/06/17/second-home-hollywood-los-angeles-selgascano/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Dezeen. (2019c). SelgasCano’s sprawling Second Home Hollywood revealed in Dezeen video. https://www.dezeen.com/2019/12/03/second-home-hollywood-selgascano-video/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Divisare. (n.d.). SelgasCano: Second Home London Office. https://divisare.com/projects/281782-selgascano-iwan-baan-second-home-london-office (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Domus. (2015). Interview to SelgasCano. https://www.domusweb.it/en/interviews/2015/09/08/interview_to_selgascano.html (Access date: 07.09. 2025)
Erdinç, S. Y. (2023). A timeless journey of strength and beauty: The potential of the use of stone in architecture. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 4(3), 317-338.
Heidegger, M. (1996). Kentin felsefesi. Cogito, 8, 67-70
Hong, Y. K., Cho, J. Y., & Wang, Z. Y. (2025). A study of interior design elements promoting the perception of healing considering gender and age: A multi-domain approach. Building and Environment, 112649.
Inhabitat. (n.d.). Selgas Cano’s incredible glass office gives employees a bug’s-eye view of the forest floor. https://inhabitat.com/incredible-glass-office-gives-employees-a-bugs-eye-view-of-the-forest-floor/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Itterson, W. H., Frank, K. A., & O’hanlon, T. J. (1976). The nature of environmental experience. In S. Wapner, S. B. Cohen, & B. Kaplan (Eds.), Experiencing the environment (pp. 187-207). Plenum Press.
Iwan. (n.d.a). Second Home Hollywood. https://iwan.com/portfolio/secondhome-hollywood-selgas-cano/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Iwan. (n.d.b). Second Home London. https://iwan.com/portfolio/second home london/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Iwan. (n.d.c). Selgas Cano Office Madrid. https://iwan.com/portfolio/selgascano-office-madrid/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Iwan. (n.d.d). Silicon House Madrid. https://iwan.com/portfolio/silicon-house-madrid-selgas-cano/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Jaglarz, A. (2023). Perception of color in architecture and urbanspace. Buildings, 13(8), 2000. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082000
Johnson, P. A. (1994). Context and contextualism. In The theory of architecture: Concepts, themes & practices (pp. 285-287).
Kahvecioğlu, B., Mutlu Avinç, G., & Arslan Selçuk, S. (2024). Biomimetic adaptive building façade modeling for sustainable urban freshwater ecosystems: Integration of nature’s water-harvesting strategy into sun-breakers. Biomimetics, 9(9), 569.
Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional affinity toward nature as a motivational basis to protect nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202.
Khanzadeh, M. (2024). Enhancing user experience in interior architecture through biophilic design: A case study of urban residential spaces. New Design Ideas, 8(1), 137-168.
Mahnke, F. H. (2004). Color in architecture: More than just decoration. Archinect Features.
Makinde, O. O., Akangbe, O. O., & Makinde, O. T. (2024). Factors influencing the choice of building materials and their relationships to human health. Journal Management and Hospitality, 1(3), 69-79.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503-515.
Moore, R. (2014). Second Home review: A good day at the office. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2014/dec/14/second-home-review-london-office-selgas-cano (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Mozaikçi, B. (2010). Mimarlıkta forma dayalı algı kavramı: Metal malzemeler üzerine bir inceleme. In Tasarımda Genç Bakışlar Ulusal Sempozyumu (27 Ekim 2010). İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi.
Mundelsalle, Y. J. (2019). SelgasCano believes in architecture that is lightweight, transparent, open and respectful of nature. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/yjeanmundelsalle/2019/07/07/selgascano-believes-in-architecture-that-is-lightweight-transparent-open-and-respectful-of-nature/ (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Mutlu Avinç, G. (2024). Biyofilik tasarım ilkelerinin ofis mekanları üzerindeki etkisi. Online Journal of Art and Design, 12(1).
Mutlu Avinç, G., & Arslan Selçuk, S. (2019). Mimari tasarımda biyomimetik yaklaşımlar: Pavyonlar üzerine bir araştırma. Online Journal of Art and Design, 7(2).
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating nearby nature: Affective forecasting errors obscure the happy path to sustainability. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101-1106.
Noraslı, M. (2024). Perceptual effect of color use in patient rooms. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 5(2), 300-313.
Norberg-Schulz, C. (1979). Genius loci: Towards a phenomenology of architecture. Rizzoli.
Pallasmaa, J. (2018). Architecture as experience. Architectural Research in Finland, 2(1), 9-17.
Palmer, J. A. (1993). Development of concern for the environment and formative experiences of educators. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(3), 26-30.
Paschoarelli, L., da Silva, F. M., & da Silva, J. M. N. (2024). Everyday design products and long-term memory: the colour influence on emotional response and perceived usability. Convergences-Journal of Research and Arts Education, 17(34), 15-23.
Pinto, L. M., & Fidalgo, A. (2025, July). Shaping space with color: Perception, emotion, and representation. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism-ICCAUA, 8(1), 269-276.
Radwan, A. H. (2015). Color in architecture: Is it just an aesthetic value or a true human need? International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), 4(12), 523-533.
Rapoport, A. (1980). Cross cultural aspects of environmental design. In I. Altman, A. Rapoport, & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (Vol. 4, pp. 7-47). Plenum Press.
Rui, L., & Firzan, M. (2024). Emotional design in contemporary interior spaces: User experience and emerging trends. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(1), 2025040 https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025040
Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327-339.
Selgas, J., & Cano, L. (2011). Estudio Selgascano: Madrid, España. ARQ (Santiago), (77), 54-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-69962011000100009
SelgasCano. (2015). SelgasCano interview: The less architecture the better [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vd4-d8R8F9o (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Sime, J. D. (1986). Creating places or designing spaces? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6(1), 49-63.
Stedman, R. (2006). Understanding place attachment among second home owners. American Behavioral Science, 50(2), 187-205.
Sward, L., & Marcinkowski, L. (2001). Environmental sensitivity: A review of the research 1980-1998. Essential Readings in Environmental Education, 277-288.
The Architectural Review. (2014). The best office in the world? Selgas Cano’s new work space in London. https://www.architectural-review.com/today/the-best-office-in-the-world-selgas-canos-new-work-space-in-london/8677631.article (Access date: 07.09.2025)
Tschumi, B. (1994). Architecture and event. The Museum of Modern Art.
Tschumi, B. (2000). Event cities 2. MIT Press.
Wastiels, L., & Wouters, I. (2009). Material considerations in architectural design: A study of the aspects identified by architects for selecting materials. Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/511/1/fulltext.pdf
Wastiels, L., & Wouters, I. (2012). Architects’ considerations while selecting materials. Materials and Design, 34, 584-593.
Wijesooriya, N., Brambilla, A., & Markauskaite, L. (2025). Biophilic quality matrix: A tool to evaluate the biophilic quality of a building during early design stage. Cleaner Production Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clpl.2025.100094
Wilson, E. O. (1984). The drive to discovery. The American Scholar, 53(4), 447-464.
Zhou, Y., Zhao, X., Feng, Y., Xuan, C., Yang, C., & Jia, X. (2025). Effects of visual perception of building materials on human emotional states and cognitive functioning in a physical learning environment. Buildings, 15(7), 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15071163
Zumthor, P. (1988). A way of looking at things. In P. Zumthor, Thinking architecture (pp. 9-26). Birkhäuser.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sena Işıklar Bengi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


