From real spaces to virtual spaces: The metaverse and decentralized cinema
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3si070Keywords:
augmented reality, cinema, decentralization, metaverse, virtual realityAbstract
Developments in computer and communication technologies, which constitute the starting point of concepts such as decentralization, virtuality, simulation, augmented reality and metaverse, have also brought new forms of expression and designs in art to the agenda. In addition to the decentralized data architecture and metaverse areas that emerged in parallel with the development of network technologies, applications that increase the user's interaction and beleaguered experience such as virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality have increased their effectiveness in this field. The metaverse spaces that emerge with the cooperation of software, art and architecture offer their users a more similar life simulation of natural life through augmented reality vehicles or screens. Here, users can perform new experiences for artistic production and consumption as well as daily life practices such as socialization and communication. Metaverse spaces, which include the design of a three-dimensional virtual universe that can be supported by augmented reality, are free from all the constraints of the real world as a cinematic plateau. It is seen as a great advantage that the real film set can create a cinematic work without expensive equipment such as cameras, lights, and sound away from all the negativities of the natural shooting conditions. The fact that the production, distribution and screening of cinema works can be realized within this field brings a new understanding of decentralized cinema to the agenda. Decentralized cinema, which has begun to rise in the expanding virtual geography of the metaverse virtual space with its advantages such as virtual characters and scenes and creative space fictions, is an art form worth examining. This study focuses on the possible future transformations of cinema in terms of production and representation in the context of the relationship of virtual and augmented reality technologies with developing metaverse areas. The emergence of a new cinematic ecology; The opportunities and obstacles it provides to producers are examined with the philosophical criticism method through concepts such as virtual and augmented reality, web 3.0, metaverse in terms of audience experiences it offers for screening. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the metaverse area has many advantages in terms of the production of cinema works, democratization of the production and distribution of works, digital privacy and security for metaverse artists, and recognition of ownership for digital works of art.
Metrics
References
- Albayrak, M. (2021). Metaverse’ün Geleceği Nasıl Olabilir? NFT’ler Metaverse’de Anahtar Niteliği Taşıyor Olabilir Mi? Retrieved from https://www.sempeak.com/blog/metaverse-nedir-metaverse-ve-nft-iliskisi#metaverseun-gelecegi-nasil-olabilir-nftler-metaversede-anahtar-niteligi-tasiyor-olabilir-mi, (E.T.: 06.06.2022).
- Alemdar, M. (2022). Yeni Bir Mekân/Alem Tanımı: Metaverse. Retrieved from https://www.mimaridusunce.com/detay?yaziId=5280
- Alexander, Y. (2017). New Realities: Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in the 21st Century. Long Island University Press.
- Anadolu, B. (2019). Dijital hikâye anlatıcılığı bağlamında yapay zekânın sinemaya etkisi: Sunspring ve It’s No Game filmlerinin analizi. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, (1), 39-56. 10.17680/erciyesiletisim.483510.
- Arvas, İ. S. (2022). Gutenberg Galaksisinden Meta Evrenine: Üçüncü Kuşak İnternet. Web 3.0. Academic Journal of Information Tecnology, 13(48), 54-71. 10.5824/ajite.2022.01.003.x.
- Ausbourne, R. (2007). Optical Illusions. WarWickshire: Pomegranate Comm. Inc.
- Baudrillard, J. (2003). Tam Ekran. İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
- Braun, M. (1992). Picturing time: the work of Etienne-Jules Marey (1830-1904). University of Chicago Press.
- Berger, J. (2007). Görme Biçimleri. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
- Çağlayan, S., Korkmaz, M., & Öktem, G. (2014). Sanatta Görsel Algının Literatür Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 160-173.
- Demir, R., & Değerli, A. S. (2022). Fotoğraftan Metaverse'e Gerçeğin Dijital Temsili ve İmge. Sanat ve İnsan Dergisi, 179-189.
- Ekmekçi, D.R. (2022). Metaverse Sinemanın Geleceğini Değiştirecek Mi. Retrieved from https://www.filmarasidergisi.com/metaverse-sinemanin-gelecegini-degistirecek-mi/
- Erdem, O. (2021). Epic’in yeni aracı MetaHuman ile gerçekçi yüzler oluşturun. Retrieved from https://technotoday.com.tr/epicin-yeni-araci-metahuman-ile-gercekci-yuzler-olusturun/
- Ferhat, S. (2016). Dijital Dünyanın Gerçekliği, Gerçek Dünyanın Sanallığı Bir Dijital Medya Ürünü Olarak Sanal Gerçeklik. TRT Akademi, 724-746.
- Gibson, W. (1998). Neuromancer. İstanbul: Sarmal Yayınevi.
- Girgin, Ü. H. (2019). Simülasyon evrenine özgü sinema. SineFilozofi, 4(8), 196-225.
- Güner, A. (2022). Dijitalleşmenin Çağdaş Sanat Müzeleri ve Galerilere Etkileri. Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sanat ve Tasarım Ana Sanat Dalı (Doktora). İstanbul.
- Haley, S. (2018). Perspective Driving. Tempe Digital.
- Hanson, A., & Mann, E. (2014). Cool Optical İllusions. Minnesota: ABDO publishing.
- Inceelli, A. (2005). Dijital Hikâye Anlatımının Bileşenleri. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(3).
- İpek, A. R. (2020). Artırılmış Gerçeklik, Sanal Gerçeklik ve Karma Gerçeklik Kavramlarında İsimlendirme ve Tanımlandırma Sorunları. İdil Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 1061-1072.
- Louro, D., Fraga, T., & Pontuschka, M. (2009). Metaverse: Building Affective Systems and Its Digital Morphologies in Virtual Environments. Journal For Virtual Worlds Research, 2(5).
- Manovich, L. (1999). New media: A user’s guide. Net. Condition.
- Manovich, L (2001) The Language of New Media MIT Press, USA.
- Manovich, L. (2001). What is new media. The language of new media, 6, 1-15.
- Manovich, L. (2003). New media from Borges to HTML. The new media reader, 1(2), 13-25.
- McLuhan, M., & Powers, B. (2001). Global Köy. İstanbul: Scala Yayıncılık.
- Mitchell, W. J. (1986). Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Onat, E. (2015). Perspektif ve perspektifle gölge çizimi. Ankara: Efil yayınevi.
- Ondrejka, C. (2004). Escaping The Gilded Cage: User Created Content and Building the Metaverse. NYL Sch. L. Rev., 49, 81.
- Robins, K. (1999). İmaj: Görmenin Kültür ve Politikası. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
- Sartori, G. (2004). Görmenin İktidarı. İstanbul: Karakutu Yayınları.
- Seylan, A. (2019). Temel Tasarım. İstanbul: Yem Yayın.
- Şekerci, C. (2016). Sanal Gerçekliğin Farklı Alanlarda Kullanımı. 3. Uluslararası Güzel Sanatlar Bilimsel Araştırma Günleri, 113-122.
- Timur, S., & Keş, Y. (2016). Grafik Tasarımda Üç Boyut Algısı. İdil Sanat ve Tasarım Dergisi, 655-676.
- Turan, T., & Kavut, İ. E. Gerçeküstü Sanat Akımının Kurgusal Mekânlara ve Metaverse Kavramına Katkısının Norm Bağlamında İncelenmesi. Journal Of Architectural Sciences and Applications, 7(1), 346-363. doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1079846.
- Tüker, Ç. (2015). Üç Boyutlu Sayısal Ortam Araçlarının Görsel İletişim Tasarımı Bağlamında Öğretimi: Bir Lisans Dersi Örneği. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 37-56.
- Wallace, C.,& Kung, F.& Knottenbelt, F. (2021) What İs the metaverse?. Reed Smith Guide to The Metaverse, Issue 1 - May 2021.
- Zengin, F. (2018). Dijital Dönüşüm Çağında Dijital Sinemanın Avantajları ve Ortaya Çıkardığı Yeni Sorunlar. Journal Of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 5(21), 844-859.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Murat Aytas, Aytekin Can
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.