Symbiotic spatiality in domestic interiors: A spatial model for human-animal cohabitation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2026.v7i1201

Keywords:

multispecies architecture, human-animal cohabitation, posthumanist design, interior spatial organization, symbiotic spatial model

Abstract

Domestic interiors have historically been organized through anthropocentric spatial logics in which architectural layouts, circulation systems, and spatial hierarchies are structured primarily around human needs and bodily experience. However, the increasing presence of animals as everyday companions within contemporary households has gradually transformed domestic environments into shared multispecies habitats. Despite this transformation, architectural responses often remain limited to functional adjustments rather than reconsidering interior spatial organization itself. Addressing this gap, the study proposes the Symbiotic Spatial Model as an analytical framework for examining how domestic interiors reorganize when animals are recognized as spatial actors rather than accommodated occupants. The model translates post-humanist spatial discourse into three operational layers: hierarchical reconfiguration, multi-species circulation, and negotiated boundaries. The framework is applied through a comparative spatial analysis of two contemporary residential projects that explicitly integrate human–animal cohabitation. The findings demonstrate that symbiotic coexistence emerges through different spatial mechanisms, including plan-based redistribution of hierarchy and sectional stratification of movement systems. By operationalizing multispecies theory through spatial parameters, the study contributes a methodological framework for interpreting human–animal coexistence within interior architecture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Neşe Başak Yurttaş, Biruni University

    Neşe Başak Yurttaş is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design at Biruni University. She received her Ph.D. in Interior Architecture from Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University. Prior to her academic career, she worked for 19 years as a senior interior architect in international companies. She currently teaches undergraduate design studio courses. Her research focuses on themed spaces, spatial identity, inclusive design, and architectural design education.

References

ArchDaily. (2026a). Home of pets / HDD. Retrieved January, 12, 2026, from https://www.archdaily.com/893059/home-of-pets-hdd

ArchDaily. (2026b). Pets and human positive house / Studio ruizvelazquez. Retrieved January, 15, 2026 from https://www.archdaily.com/1023787/pets-and-human-positive-house-studio-ruizvelazquez

Ashby, M., Balas, D., & Cora, J. (2016). Materials and sustainable development (1st ed.). Butterworth_Heinemann.

Bekoff, M. (2007). The emotional lives of animals: A leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy-and why they matter. New World Library.

Bradshaw, J. (2017). The animals among us: How pets make us human. Basic Books.

Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman (1st ed.). Polity Press.

Chapin, F. S., Vitousek, P. M., & Matson, P. A. (2011). Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology (2nd ed.). Springer.

Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture (J. Lloyd, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.

Grandin, T., & Johnson, C. (2005). Animals in translation: Using the mysteries of autism to decode animal behavior. Scribner.

Haraway, D. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Para-digm Press.

Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203818336

Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor_network_theory (1st ed.). Oxford Univer-sity Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001

Lovelock, J. (2000). Gaia: A new look at life on Earth. Oxford University Press.

Odum, E. (1971). Fundamentals of ecology (3rd ed.). W. B. Saunders.

Pallasmaa, J. (2012). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Ulrich, R., Zimring, C., Zhu, X., DuBose, J., Seo, H.-B., Choi, Y.-S., & Joseph, A. (2008). A review of the research literature on evidence-based healthcare design. HERD: Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 1(3), 61-125.

Wakkary, R. (2021). Things we could design: For more than human-centered worlds (1st ed.). The MIT Press.

Yurttaş, N., & Altuncu, D. (2022). New possibilities of living together in post-humanist society: Interior and furniture design for pets. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning (DRArch), 3(3), 281-294. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2022.v3i3058

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available on request.

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Yurttaş, N. B. (2026). Symbiotic spatiality in domestic interiors: A spatial model for human-animal cohabitation. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 7(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2026.v7i1201

Similar Articles

51-60 of 198

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)