Reflective thinking and self-assessment: A model for the architectural design studio

Cemile Sanem Ersine Masatlıoğlu; Özge Can Balaban

doi:10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i1118

Reflective thinking and self-assessment: A model for the architectural design studio

Authors

Cemile Sanem Ersine Masatlıoğlu Short Bio Gebze Technical University

C. Sanem Ersine Masatlıoğlu graduated from Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University in 2010 after completing her secondary and high school education at Istanbul [Erkek] High School. She worked at domestic and international construction sites in 2010–11 and completed her master's degree in the Architectural Design Department of Istanbul Technical University Architecture Program in 2012. She received her doctorate degree from the same department in 2018 with a thesis focused on "studio culture" within the field of architectural education. During her doctorate, she worked for four months in the "environmental systems" laboratory at the Universita degli Studi di Napoli Federico II on the re-evaluation of industrial heritage. Between 2011 and 21, she taught design studios and many other courses full-time and part-time at various universities. In 2018, she began her Assistant Professor position as a founding member of the department at Istanbul Şehir University's Architecture Department. As of 2021, she continues her teaching and research at Gebze Technical University.
Özge Can Balaban Short Bio Gebze Technical University

Born in 1981, Özge Can Balaban obtained her undergraduate degree in Architecture from Istanbul Technical University in 2005. Subsequent to a decade of professional engagement as an architect and project manager within numerous architectural design offices and at various construction sites, she returned to her alma mater to pursue a Master of Science in 'Traditional Utopianism and Architecture'. She is presently advancing her doctoral research at the same institution. Concurrently, Ms. Balaban holds a lecturing position at the Architectural Department of Gebze Technical University, where she imparts instruction in Design and several theoretical courses, including 'Architectural Readings'.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i1118

Keywords:

disciplinary literacy, peer assessment, reflective thinking, self-assessment, architectural education, studio-based pedagogy

Abstract

Developing, experimenting, and sharing critical pedagogical approaches is becoming increasingly important in architectural education, which supposedly superposes theory and practice. In this article, the authors reveal and reflect on an enriching pedagogical approach to the traditional architectural design studio. It is acknowledged that students develop comprehensive examination and internalization abilities by developing reflective thinking and self-evaluation abilities that complement each other. Based on the pioneer educational theory of John Dewey, the researchers' selected instructional interventions. Using the action research method, four additional modes conceptualized towards disciplinary literacy -reading, mapping, discussion, and peer assessment- were injected into the traditional studio process during a semester of architectural design course. The pedagogical approach is built on questioning the two basic creativity-based abilities of learners: reflective thinking and self-assessment. The fundamental questions are: How can a reading-discussion setup designed to nurture disciplinary literacy in the design studio be a factor in developing reflective thinking ability? How can the systematic peer assessment exercise be a factor in the students' self-assessment and reflective thinking skills as a learning outcome? The results argue for the effects on students' intangible skills. The model studio setup exhibited two remarkable findings, showing that (i) the reading-discussion mode is more effective in generating reflective thinking and (ii) the systematic peer review exercise is more effective in gaining self-assessment ability. The aim is to contribute to the theory of education by making the model application in the field of architectural design studio accessible and reflective for other educators.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Alanyalı Aral, E. (2019) Giriş. İlişkisel bir eylem olarak haritalama, Dosya 42, TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi. http://www.mimarlarodasiankara.org/index.php?Did=3209
Boud, D., (1995). Assessment and learning: contradictory or complementary. Assessment for learning in higher education, 35-48.
Boud, D. & Falchikov, N., (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher education, 18(5), 529-549.
Dewey, J., (1938). Experience and Education. Indianapolis: Kappa Delta Pi.
Dewey, J., (2022). Nasıl Düşünürüz? Ankara: Fol.
Dixon, B. S., (2020). Dewey and Design. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Dutton, T. A., (ed.) (1991). Voices in Architectural Education: Cultural politics and pedagogy. Praeger.
Falchikov, N., (2007). The place of peers in learning and assessment. In Rethinking assessment in higher education (pp. 138-153). Routledge.
Findeli, A., (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design issues, 17(1), 5-17.
Hatton, N. & Smith, D., (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and teacher education, 11(1), 33-49.
James, R., McInnis, C. & Devlin, M., (2002). Assessing learning in Australian universities. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
Knowles, M. S., (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers.
Kolb, D., (1984). Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and development, 41.
Kvan, T., (2001). The problem in studio teaching–revisiting the pedagogy of studio teaching.
Ledewitz, S. (1985). Models of design in studio teaching. Journal of architectural education, 38(2), 2-8.
McConachie, S. M. & Petrosky, A. R. (2009). Content matters: A disciplinary literacy approach to improving student learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Nicol, D., (2014). Guiding principles for peer review: unlocking learners’ evaluative skills. Advances and innovations in university assessment and feedback, 197-224.
Nicol, D. & Pilling, S. (2000). Architectural education and the profession. Changing Architectural Education: Towards a New Profession, 1, 22.
Piaget, J., (1970). Science of Education and The Psychology of The Child. Trans. D. Coltman.
Quay, J. & Seaman, J., (2013). John Dewey and Education Outdoors: Making sense of the ‘educational situation’ through more than a century of progressive reforms. Springer Science & Business Media.
Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Sage.
Salama, A. M. (1995). New Trends in Architectural Education: Designing the design studio. Arti-arch.
Salama A. M. (2007). Introduction- Legacies for the future of design studio pedagogy.
Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial Design Education. Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Scheer, A., Noweski, C. & Meinel, C., (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3).
Schön, D. A., (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design studies, 9(3), 181-190.
Steven Holl Architects – Ex of in House, Hudson Valley https://www.stevenholl.com/project/ex-of-in-house/
Swann, C., (2002). Action research and the practice of design. Design issues, 18(1), 49-61.
Tarrant, S. P. & Thiele, L. P., (2016). Practice makes pedagogy –John Dewey and skills-based sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.
TMMOB, (2020). Türkiye Mimarlık Eğitimi Politikası http://www.tmmob.org.tr/sites/default/files/turkiye_mimarlik_egitimi_politikasi_icin_tiklayiniz.pdf
Vidler, A., (2000). Diagrams of diagrams: architectural abstraction and modern representation. Representations, 72, 1-20.
Zuber-Skerritt, O., (1992). Action Research in Higher Education: Examples and reflections. Kogan Page Limited, 120 Pentonville Road, London N1 9JN England, United Kingdom.

Downloads

PDF

325

217

Published

2024-04-23

How to Cite

Ersine Masatlıoğlu, C. S., & Balaban, Özge C. (2024). Reflective thinking and self-assessment: A model for the architectural design studio. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 5(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i1118