Beyond the hype: Reflections on the implications of AI for urban design education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6si192

Keywords:

urban design education, pedagogy, curricula, skills, Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Abstract

The emergence of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) is reshaping Higher Education and professional practice, demanding critical reflection on its implications for Urban Design education. This viewpoint explores how AI challenges educational models and transforms design practice. In higher education, GenAI offers opportunities for personalized learning and innovative teaching, but raises enormous challenges regarding assessment validity, learners’ intellectual development, and ethics. Within Urban Design, AI is already being used for tasks such as data analysis, image generation, design generation, and optimization. But AI development and adoption have the potential to further transform design, expanding automation and questioning the role of the designer. Drawing on literature, interviews with UK practitioners, and critical reflection, this viewpoint puts forward some reflections about ways in which urban design education may engage with and respond to the emergence of AI. First, institutions must adopt a critically engaged approach, balancing innovation with caution and ethical responsibility. Second, assessment practices require structural redesign to safeguard learning validity while embracing AI’s potential productively. Third, curricula must be updated to integrate critical AI literacy while protecting fundamental design and spatial reasoning skills. Fourth, AI offers potential to enhance teaching and learning. As AI becomes integral to design practice, educators must reimagine pedagogies to ensure graduates are equipped to navigate and shape an AI-augmented urban future. Ultimately, urban design education stands at a crossroads - where the choices made today will determine whether AI enhances or undermines the intellectual and ethical foundations of the discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Juliana Martins, University College London

    Juliana Martins is an Associate Professor (Teaching) in Urban Design at the Bartlett School of Planning, University College London (UCL). She holds a degree in Architecture from the Faculty of Architecture, Technical University of Lisbon, an MA in Housing and Urbanism from the Architectural Association School of Architecture, London, and a PhD in Planning Studies from the Bartlett School of Planning, UCL. Her research on design and planning education focuses on the implications of artificial intelligence for teaching and professional practice, contemporary urban design pedagogy, and the role of design in the education of planners.

References

As, I., Basu, P., & Talwar, P. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning and Design: Technologies, Implementation, and Impacts. Elsevier.

Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron, J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., Crompton, H., Koutropoulos, A., Terentev, E., Pazurek, A., Nichols, M., Sidorkin, A. M., Costello, E., Watson, S., Mulligan, D., Honeychurch, S., … Asino, T. I. (2024). The Manifesto for Teaching and Learning in a Time of Generative AI: A Critical Collective Stance to Better Navigate the Future | Open Praxis. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777

Çalışkan, O., Barut, Y. B., & Ongun, G. (2024). Parametric Urban Design Thinking: Shared Patterns in Design by Algorithm and Design by Drawing. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(3), 1010–1029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X211053653

Chaillou, S. (2025). Artificial Intelligence and Architecture: From Research to Practice. Birkhäuser.

Corbin, T., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Dawson, P. (2025a). The wicked problem of AI and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2553340

Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025b). Talk is cheap: Why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964

Costa, C., & Murphy, M. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence in education: (What) are we thinking? Learning, Media and Technology, 0(0), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2025.2518258

El_Tantawy, H. A., Abobeah, R., Atia, M., & Abdelhamid, M. A. (2024). Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Urban Design. Journal of Al-Azhar University Engineering Sector, 19(72), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.21608/auej.2024.270335.1626

Fagan, D., Holberton, T., Medel-Vera, C., Phillips, K., WANG, T.-H., Zhao, X., Kolbe, N., Hales, D., Black, C., Pothier, D., Regan-Alexander, K., Sabak, J., Tarabishy, S., Tsigkari, M., & Zamorano, P. (2025). AI and the Future of Architectural Education in the UK: Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17154626

Fareed, M. W., Bou Nassif, A., & Nofal, E. (2024). Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence Image Generators for Educating the History of Architecture. Heritage, 7(3), 1727–1753. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage7030081

Flenady, G., & Sparrow, R. (n.d.). Cut the bullshit: Why GenAI systems are neither collaborators nor tutors. Teaching in Higher Education, 0(0), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2025.2497263

Freeman, J. (2025). Student Generative AI Survey 2025 (No. Policy Note 61). HEPI.

Guridi, J. A., Cheyre, C., Goula, M., Santo, D., Humphreys, L., Souras, A., & Shankar, A. (2025). Image Generative AI to Design Public Spaces: A Reflection of How AI Could Improve Co-Design of Public Parks. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3656588

Huang, T., Ye, X., Yigitcanlar, T., Xu, B., Newman, G., Zhao, B., Ennemoser, B., Wu, D., Kim, J., & Wang, D. (2026). Artificial Intelligence in urban design: A systematic review. Cities, 169, 106527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2025.106527

Jin, S., Tu, H., Li, J., Fang, Y., Qu, Z., Xu, F., Liu, K., & Lin, Y. (2024). Enhancing Architectural Education through Artificial Intelligence: A Case Study of an AI-Assisted Architectural Programming and Design Course. Buildings, 14(6), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061613

Kee, T., Kuys, B., & King, R. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Architecture Education to Develop Digital Literacy and Holistic Competency. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture, 3(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v3i1.8347

Liang, J., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. T. L. (2025). A systematic review of the early impact of artificial intelligence on higher education curriculum, instruction, and assessment. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1522841

Lubbe, A. (2025, October 5). Universities can turn AI from a threat to an opportunity by teaching critical thinking. The Conversation. https://doi.org/10.64628/AAJ.6tveerfcw

Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56–75. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.9643

Ouyang, F., & Jiao, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100020

RIBA. (2025). RIBA Artificial Intelligence Report 2025. RIBA. https://www.architecture.com/knowledge-and-resources/resources-landing-page/riba-ai-report-2025?srsltid=AfmBOoq-p9IHHBRmfYWG9Ne6PJABpdXxjciDIaOiAhNO4c3ReNhriibM

Salazar-Miranda, A., Fan, Z., Baick, M., Hampton, K. N., Duarte, F., Loo, B. P. Y., Glaeser, E., & Ratti, C. (2025). Exploring the social life of urban spaces through AI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(30), e2424662122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2424662122

Schlickman, E., & Magana-Leon, A. (2024). Employing Generative Technology in Urban Design: An Aid or a Threat? Journal of Digital Landscape Architecture, 9, 772–779.

Siu, K. W. M., Zou, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, K., & Zhao, T. (2025). Dynamic scaffolding: Exploring the role of artificial intelligence in urban design education. Frontiers of Urban and Rural Planning, 3(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44243-025-00060-7

Ullah, M., Bin Naeem, S., & Kamel Boulos, M. N. (2024). Assessing the Guidelines on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Tools in Universities: A Survey of the World’s Top 50 Universities. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 8(12), 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc8120194

Veale, M., Black, I., Dsouza, M., Fisher, M., Ghaus, M., Gibbs, T., Lynskey, O., O’Cinneide, C., Scotford, E., Thomas, O., Trapova, A., & Trapp, K. (2025, May 5). Artificial Intelligence, Education and Assessment at UCL Laws: Current Thinking and Next Steps for the UK Legal Education Sector (Working / Discussion Paper No. 04/2025). (UCL Legal Studies Research Paper Series 04/2025). UCL Faculty of Laws: London, UK. (2025); UCL Faculty of Laws. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/research/ucl-legal-studies-research-paper-series

Vieriu, A. M., & Petrea, G. (2025). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Students’ Academic Development. Education Sciences, 15(3), 343. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15030343

Whitham, R., Jacobs, N., Coulton, P., Stockton, G., & Lindley, J. (2024). Re-imagining and reaffirming design pedagogy in response to generative AI tools. DRS Biennial Conference Series. https://dl.designresearchsociety.org/drs-conference-papers/drs2024/researchpapers/299

Yavuz Özgür, I., & Çalışkan, O. (2025). Urban design pedagogies: An international perspective. URBAN DESIGN International. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-025-00271-w

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Viewpoints

How to Cite

Martins, J. (2025). Beyond the hype: Reflections on the implications of AI for urban design education. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 6(Special Issue), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6si192

Similar Articles

71-80 of 191

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.