A theoretical framework on embodiment in digital design

Authors

  • Serdar Aşut image/svg+xml Delft University of Technology

    Dr. Serdar Aşut is an educator and researcher at the Faculty of Architecture and the Built Environment of TU Delft. He is an architect and holds a PhD in Architectural Design Computing. His works explore topics at the intersection of digital technologies and the built environment, including computational methods, creative robotics, digital fabrication, and architecture and design education.

  • Arzu Erdem image/svg+xml Istinye University

    Prof. Dr. Arzu Erdem currently works at Istinye University and serves as the Dean of the Faculty of Fine Arts, Design and Architecture. Her research interests include design education, computational design thinking and interdisciplinary strategies of design practice and education. She has designed several architectural projects and contributed to architectural design competitions. She is currently on the Board of Directors of Rubicon Foundation (The Netherlands) and the Board of Directors of Kale Ceramic INC, SEV Foundation and ITU Development Foundation.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5si152

Keywords:

design thinking, design methods, digital design tools, computer-aided design, human-computer interaction

Abstract

This article presents a theoretical discussion on the need for developing digital design environments that can strengthen our relations with the tangible, tacit, and implicit dimensions of design cognition. It synthesizes relevant concepts and theories in the field of phenomenology, addressing creative design thinking. It suggests that designer's tacit ways of knowing can be accommodated in digital design practices by developing tools that allow intuitive and embodied interactions. To this end, it points out specific concepts, methods, and theories within Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) research, arguing that they can enable the development of better digital design tools that can cope with complex human perceptual mechanisms, including touch, as an extension of both body and mind, and that can encompass the implicit areas inherent in design knowledge. Therefore, concerning the creative design disciplines, it highlights the importance of closely following the findings of research within HCI that are relevant to design knowledge and its implementation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Aarts, E., & Encarnação, J. (2006). Into ambient intelligence. In E. Aarts & J. Encarnação (Eds.), True visions: The emergence of ambient intelligence (pp. 1-16). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28974-6_1
  • Aish, R. (1979). 3D input for CAAD systems. Computer - Aided Design, 11(2), 66 - 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(79)90098-8
  • Aish, R., & Noakes, P. (1984). Architecture without numbers - CAAD based on a 3D modelling system. Computer - Aided Design, 16(6), 321 - 328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4485(84)90116-7
  • Augusto, J. C., Callaghan, V., Cook, D., Kameas, A., & Satoh, I. (2013). Intelligent environments: A manifesto. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-1962-3-12
  • Baber, C. (2003). Cognition and tool use: Forms of engagement in human and animal use of tools. Taylor & Francis.
  • Beattie, N., Horan, B., & McKenzie, S. (2015). Taking the LEAP with the Oculus HMD and CAD-plucking at thin air? Procedia Technology, 20, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2015.07.025
  • Bourguet, M. L. (2003). Designing and prototyping multimodal commands. INTERACT '03, Zurich.
  • Burden, A. G., Caldwell, G. A., & Guertler, M. R. (2022). Towards human-robot collaboration in construction: Current cobot trends and forecasts. Construction Robotics, 6(3 - 4), 209 - 220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-022-00085-0
  • Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221-227.
  • De Araújo, B. R., Casiez, G., Jorge, J. A., & Hachet, M. (2013). Mockup builder: 3D modeling on and above the surface. Computers & Graphics, 37(3), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2012.12.005
  • Dellermann, D., Ebel, P., Söllner, M., & Leimeister, J. M. (2019). Hybrid intelligence. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(5), 637-643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-019-00595-2
  • Dennett, D. C. (2000). Making tools for thinking. In S. Dan (Ed.), Metarepresentations: A multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 17-29). Oxford University Press.
  • Devendorf, L., & Ryokai, K. (2015). Being the machine proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea (pp. 2477-2486).
  • Diderot, D., & Jourdain, M. (2010). Diderot's early philosophical works (1911). Kessinger Publishing.
  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1967). Why computers must have bodies in order to be intelligent. The Review of Metaphysics, 21(1), 13-32.
  • Dutta, A. (2007). The bureaucracy of beauty: Design in the age of its global reproducibility. Routledge.
  • Follmer, S., & Ishii, H. (2012). KidCAD proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Austin, Texas, USA (pp. 2401-2410).
  • Frost, D., Lee, R., Paek, E.-H., & Jacobs, J. (2024). Demonstration of SketchPath: Using digital drawing to integrate the gestural qualities of craft in CAM-based clay 3D print designing interactive systems conference, Copenhagen, Denmark (pp. 333-337).
  • Gauldie, D., Wright, M., & Shillito, A. M. (2004). 3D modelling is not for wimps part II: Stylus/mouse clicks. Eurohaptics 2004, Munich, Germany (pp. 182-189).
  • Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordances. Hilldale, USA, 1(2), 67-82.
  • Gibson, J. J. (1983). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Praeger.
  • Grigsby, S. S. (2018). Artificial intelligence for advanced human-machine symbiosis. In Augmented Cognition: Intelligent Technologies (pp. 255-266). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91470-1_22
  • Han, S., Liu, S., & Ren, L. (2023). Application of human-computer interaction virtual reality technology in urban cultural creative design. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41566-8
  • Harrison, S., Tatar, D., & Sengers, P. (2007). The three paradigms of HCI. Alt. Chi. Session at the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, California (pp. 1-18).
  • Heidegger, M. (1977). Basic writings: From being and time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964).
  • Huang, Y., & Eisenberg, M. (2012). Easigami proceedings of the sixth international conference on tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, Kingston, Ontario, Canada (pp. 41-48).
  • Iarussi, E., Li, W., & Bousseau, A. (2015). WrapIt. ACM transactions on graphics, 34(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2816795.2818118
  • Ishii, H., Ratti, C., Piper, B., Wang, Y., Biderman, A., & Ben-Joseph, E. (2004). Bringing clay and sand into digital design-continuous tangible user interfaces. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 287-299. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:Bttj.0000047607.16164.16
  • Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: Towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. CHI97: ACM Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, Georgia, Atlanta, USA (pp. 234-241).
  • Johns, R. L. (2013). Augmented reality and the fabrication of gestural form. In Rob | Arch 2012 (pp. 248-255). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-1465-0_29
  • Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B., & Takayama, L. (2006). How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. DIS '06: Proceedings of the 6th conference on designing interactive systems, University Park PA USA (pp. 140-149).
  • Latour, B., & Yaneva, A. (2017). «Give me a gun and I will make all buildings move»: An aNt’s view of architecture. Ardeth-A Magazine on the Power of the Project (1), 103-111.
  • Liu, Y., & Fu, Z. (2024). Hybrid intelligence: Design for sustainable multiverse via integrative cognitive creation model through human - computer collaboration. Applied Sciences, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14114662
  • Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind: A theory of material engagement. The MIT Press.
  • Mallgrave, H. F. (2015). Embodiment and enculturation: The future of architectural design. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01398
  • McCullough, M. (1998). Abstracting craft: The practiced digital hand. The MIT Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
  • Mitterberger, D., Dörfler, K., Sandy, T., Salveridou, F., Hutter, M., Gramazio, F., & Kohler, M. (2020). Augmented bricklaying. Construction Robotics, 4(3-4), 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41693-020-00035-8
  • Mitterberger, D., Ercan Jenny, S., Vasey, L., Lloret-Fritschi, E., Aejmelaeus-Lindström, P., Gramazio, F., & Kohler, M. (2022). Interactive robotic plastering: Augmented interactive design and fabrication for on-site robotic plastering CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, New Orleans, LA, USA (pp. 1-18).
  • Momenaei, A., Salehi Sheijani, S., Hassanzade, H., & Andaji Garmaroodi, A. (2021). Introducing a real-time tangible user interface to convert modular multi-story physical models to digital format. Nexus Network Journal, 24(4), 809-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-021-00587-4
  • Negroponte, N. (1970). The architecture machine. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8269.001.0001
  • Niu, H., Van Leeuwen, C., Hao, J., Wang, G., & Lachmann, T. (2022). Multimodal natural human-computer interfaces for computer - aided design: A review paper. Applied Sciences, 12(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/app12136510
  • Norman, D. (1990). The design of everyday things. Basic Books.
  • Norman, D. (2014). Things that make us smart: Defending human attributes in the age of the machine. Diversion Books.
  • Pallasmaa, J. (1996). The eyes of the skin: Architecture and the senses. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Polanyi, M. (2009). The tacit dimension. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Poulsen, S. B., & Thøgersen, U. (2011). Embodied design thinking: A phenomenological perspective. CoDesign, 7(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2011.563313
  • Pye, D. (1978). The nature and art of workmanship. Cambridge University Press.
  • Satyanarayanan, M. (2001). Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges. IEEE Personal Communications, 8(4), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1109/98.943998
  • Schilit, B. N., & Theimer, M. M. (1994). Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts. IEEE Network, 8(5), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1109/65.313011
  • Schmidt, A. (2000). Implicit human computer interaction through context. Personal Technologies, 4(2-3), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01324126
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
  • Schön, D. A. (1984). The architectural studio as an exemplar of education for reflection-in-action. Journal of Architectural Education, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.2307/1424770
  • Sennett, R. (2009). The craftsman. Yale University Press.
  • Sharlin, E., Itoh, Y., Watson, B., Kitamura, Y., Sutphen, S., Liu, L., & Kishino, F. (2004). Spatial tangible user interfaces for cognitive assessment and training. In A. J. Ijspeert, M. Murata, & N. Wakamiya, Biologically inspired approaches to advanced information technology, Heidelberg.
  • Sharlin, E., Watson, B., Sutphen, S., Lederer, R., Figueroa, P., & Frazer, J. (2001). 3D computer interaction using physical objects: exploration of tangible user interfaces. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 9(7).
  • Shilkrot, R., Maes, P., Paradiso, J. A., & Zoran, A. (2015). Augmented airbrush for computer aided painting (CAP). ACM Transactions on Graphics, 34(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1145/2699649
  • Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. Penguin Books.
  • Stanney, K. M., Schmorrow, D. D., Johnston, M., Fuchs, S., Jones, D., Hale, K. S., Ahmad, A., & Young, P. (2009). Augmented cognition: An overview. Reviews of Human Factors and Ergonomics, 5(1), 195-224. https://doi.org/10.1518/155723409x448062
  • Steiner, R. (1958). Man as a being of sense and perception. Anthroposophical Publishing Company.
  • Steiner, R. (1981). Man’s twelve senses in their relation to imagination, inspiration, intuition. Anthroposophical Review, 3(2), 12-19.
  • Sutherland, I. E. (1964). Sketch pad a man-machine graphical communication system proceedings of the SHARE design automation workshop, https://doi.org/10.1145/800265.810742
  • Sutphen, S., Sharlin, E., Watson, B., & Frazer, J. (2000). Reviving a tangible interface affording 3D spatial interaction. Proc. 11th Western Canadian computer graphics symp, British Columbia, Canada (pp. 155-166).
  • Svanæs, D. (2009). Context-aware technology: A phenomenological perspective. Human-Computer Interaction, 16(2-4), 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci16234_17
  • Vuletic, T., Duffy, A., Hay, L., McTeague, C., Campbell, G., & Grealy, M. (2019). Systematic literature review of hand gestures used in human computer interaction interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 129, 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2019.03.011
  • Vuletic, T., Duffy, A., McTeague, C., Hay, L., Brisco, R., Campbell, G., & Grealy, M. (2021). A novel user-based gesture vocabulary for conceptual design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102609
  • Vygotsky, L. (1965). Thought and language. The MIT Press.
  • Weichel, C., Hardy, J., Alexander, J., & Gellersen, H. (2015). ReForm proceedings of the 28th annual ACM symposium on user interface software & technology, Charlotte, NC, USA (pp. 93-102).
  • Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the 21 st century. Scientific american, 265(3), 94-105.
  • Weiser, M., & Brown, J. S. (1997). The coming age of calm technology. In Beyond Calculation (pp. 75-85). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0685-9_6
  • Yao, Z., Sun, Q., Liu, B., Lu, Y., Liu, G., Yang, X.-D., & Mi, H. (2024). InkBrush: A sketching tool for 3D ink painting proceedings of the CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Honolulu, HI, USA.
  • Yoshida, H., Igarashi, T., Obuchi, Y., Takami, Y., Sato, J., Araki, M., Miki, M., Nagata, K., Sakai, K., & Igarashi, S. (2015). Architecture-scale human-assisted additive manufacturing. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 34(4), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1145/2766951
  • Zoran, A., & Paradiso, J. A. (2013). FreeD proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Paris, France (pp. 2613-2616).

Downloads

  • PDF
    • | Abstract Views 64 | PDF Downloads 57

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Aşut, S., & Erdem, A. (2024). A theoretical framework on embodiment in digital design. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 5((Special Issue), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5si152

Issue

Vol. 5 No. (Special Issue) (2024)

Section

Age of Distruption

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Serdar Aşut, Arzu Erdem

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC