Towards sustainable cities: Evaluating the distribution and functionality of green spaces in Atakum

Authors

  • Deniz Yıldız Uslu image/svg+xml Ondokuz Mayıs University

    Master Student Deniz Yildiz Uslu, from Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of City and Regional Planning, Samsun, Türkiye, specializes in urban and regional planning. Her research interests include urban planning, city management, urban design, and city planning. She is pursuing her Master’s degree at Ondokuz Mayis University, Institute of Graduate Studies, Department of City and Regional Planning.

  • Hafith Mohammed Sulayman Almansouri image/svg+xml Kastamonu University

    Ph.D. Student Hafith Mohammed Sulayman Almansouri, from Kastamonu University, Institute of Science, Department of Landscape Architecture, Türkiye, specializes in landscape planning and management, with a focus on climate dynamics, land use changes, urban ecology, and plant-environment interactions. His research interests encompass the monitoring and evaluation of ecological and environmental indicators, landscape ecology, GIS, urban planning, city management, urban design, recycling, plants, landscape engineering, environmental engineering, air quality, land use, climate change, climatology, environmental change, adaptation strategies, risk management, remote sensing, satellite-based approaches, air pollution, and environmental pollution.

  • Amragia H. Mostafa Elahsadi image/svg+xml Kastamonu University

    Ph.D. Student Amragia H. Mostafa Elahsadi, from Kastamonu University, Institute of Science, Department of Landscape Architecture, Türkiye, also specializes in landscape planning and management, focusing on climate dynamics, land use changes, urban ecology, and plant-environment interactions. His research interests include ecological and environmental monitoring, landscape ecology, GIS, urban planning, city management, urban design, recycling, plants, landscape engineering, environmental engineering, air quality, land use, climate change, climatology, environmental change, adaptation strategies, risk management, remote sensing, satellite-based approaches, air pollution, and environmental pollution.

  • Mehmet Cetin image/svg+xml Ondokuz Mayıs University

    Prof. Dr. Mehmet Cetin, from Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of City and Regional Planning, Samsun, Türkiye, is a specialist in urban and regional planning, with expertise in climate dynamics, land use changes, urban ecology, and plant-environment interactions. His research interests include ecological and environmental indicator monitoring and evaluation, landscape ecology, GIS, urban planning, city management, urban design, recycling, plants, landscape engineering, environmental engineering, air quality, land use, climate change, climatology, environmental change, adaptation strategies, risk management, remote sensing, satellite-based approaches, air pollution, and environmental pollution.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i3143

Keywords:

equity in green space distribution, open and green spaces, urban planning, multifunctional areas, urbanization

Abstract

The rapid increase in urbanization has led to a concentration of population and buildings, resulting in reduced green spaces and disrupted ecological balance. This trend negatively affects the well-being and quality of life in cities. Designing green spaces according to planning standards and protecting these areas is crucial for the sustainability of urban environments and the preservation of livable spaces for future generations. In light of these challenges, it is vital to preserve and expand green spaces for both environmental and social reasons. This study aims to evaluate the spatial distribution, size, and adequacy of existing green spaces in 16 neighborhoods of Atakum, a district in Samsun that has recently undergone intense urbanization. It also assesses the accessibility of these spaces using Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The analysis of urban green spaces in Atakum was conducted through spatial and buffer zone analyses using the Spatial Analyst tool in ARCGIS 10.7, revealing the current situation of these vital areas. The findings highlight the significance of green spaces in ensuring livable and sustainable urban development, especially in rapidly urbanizing areas. The research identifies substantial disparities in the distribution and accessibility of open and green spaces in Atakum, indicating an urgent need for improved urban planning. Using GIS analysis, the study compares the availability of green spaces against the World Health Organization’s recommended standard of 10 m² per person. Results show that many neighborhoods fall short of this benchmark, a situation exacerbated by rapid urbanization and population growth. This deficit adversely impacts residents' physical and mental well-being, as adequate green space is essential for public health, social cohesion, and environmental sustainability. Additionally, the analysis reveals that existing green spaces primarily serve recreational purposes and lack multifunctionality, limiting their usability for diverse community needs. To address these deficiencies, the study recommends a multi-faceted urban planning approach, emphasizing the equitable distribution of green spaces, the design of multifunctional areas, and robust community engagement in the planning process. It also stresses the need for stronger legal frameworks to preserve and create green spaces, advocating for the integration of research and data analysis to inform evidence-based policies. In conclusion, this research contributes to understanding how urban green spaces can enhance livability, particularly in the context of climate resilience. The findings underscore the importance of strategic planning in fostering sustainable and inclusive urban environments in Atakum, offering valuable insights for future urban studies in similar contexts.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Atakum Municipality. (2023). Yenimahalle mahallesinin ikiye bölünmesi [Belediye Meclis Kararı No: 2023/58]. Samsun: Atakum Belediyesi, Türkiye. Access on: 10 June 2024.
  • Badiu, D. L., Iojă, C. I., Pătroescu, M., Breuste, J., Artmann, M., Niță, M. R., & Onose, D. A. (2016). Is urban green space per capita a valuable target to achieve cities’ sustainability goals? Romania as a case study. Ecological Indicators, 70, 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.05.044
  • Beyer, K. M., Kaltenbach, A., Szabo, A., Bogar, S., Nieto, F. J., & Malecki, K. M. (2014). Exposure to neighborhood green space and mental health: Evidence from the survey of the health of Wisconsin. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(3), 3453-3472. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/3/3453s1
  • Bilgili, B. C. (2009). Ankara kenti yeşil alanlarının kent ekosistemine olan etkilerinin bazı ekolojik göstergeler çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi üzerine bir araştırma. Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Peyzaj Mimarlığı Anabilim Dalı. Doktora Tezi.
  • Eminağaoğlu, Z., & Yavuz, A. (2010). Kentsel yeşil alanların planlanması ve tasarımını etkileyen faktörler: Artvin ili örneği. III. Ulusal Karadeniz Ormancılık Kongresi, 20-22 May 2010, Vol: IV, page 1536-1547. https://openaccess.artvin.edu.tr/xmlui/handle/11494/702
  • Ergin, G., Kılıç, S. E., & Efe, M. (2020). Planlamada evrensel tasarım ilkeleri ile erişilebilirlik ağı tasarımı, İzmit kent merkezi örneği. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1, 49 - 82. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.vi.818217
  • Ersoy, M. (2015). Kentsel planlamada standartlar. NİNOVA Yayınları.
  • Gezer, A., Gül, A., & Yücedağ, C. (2009). Kent ormancılığının kavramsal süreci ve bazı temel kavramlarla ilişkisi. Gezer, A., & Gül, A. (Ed.), Kent Ormancılığı-Kavramsal-Teknik ve Kültürel Boyutu (ISBN : 978-9944-452-30-4) İçinde. Isparta: SDU Basım Evi.
  • Gianfredi, V., Buffoli, M., Rebecchi, A., Croci, R., Oradini-Alacreu, A., Stirparo, G., Marino, A., Odone, A., Capolongo, S., & Signorelli, C. (2021). Association between urban greenspace and health: A systematic review of literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5137. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5137
  • Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Barton, D. N. (2013). Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecological Economics, 86, 235-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.08.019
  • Gül, A., Dinç, G., Akın, T., & Koçak, A. İ. (2020). Kentsel açık ve yeşil alanların mevcut yasal durumu ve uygulamadaki sorunlar. İdealkent, 11(Kentleşme Ve Ekonomi Özel Sayısı), 1281-1312. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/idealkent/issue/56755/650461
  • Gül, A., & Küçük, V. (2001). Kentsel açık-yeşil alanlar ve Isparta kenti örneğinde irdelenmesi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 27-48.
  • Hartig, T., Mitchell, R., de Vries, S., & Frumkin, H. (2014). Nature and health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 207-228.
  • Jennings, V., Gaither, C. J., & Gragg, R. S. (2012). Promoting environmental justice through urban green space access: A synopsis. Environmental Justice, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2011.0007
  • Kaya, Ü. N. (2022). Kentsel yeşil alanlara erişilebilirlik ile kullanıcıların psikolojik iyi olma hali arasındaki ilişkinin irdelenmesi: Konya kenti örneği. Konya Teknik Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Şehir ve Bölge Planlama, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Konya.
  • Keleş, R. (1980). Kentbilim terimleri sözlüğü. Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları.
  • Kuo, F. E. (2015). How might contact with nature promote human health? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1093. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01093/full
  • MEURT. (2014). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization of the Republic of Türkiye (2014). Mekânsal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği. Access on: 24 June 2024. https://www.csb.gov.tr/TR-223019/Mekansal-Planlar-Yapim-Yonetmeligi.html
  • Mitchell, R., & Popham, F. (2008). Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: An ecological and cross-sectional analysis. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1655-1660. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(08)61689-X/fulltext
  • Niemelä, J., Saarela, S. R., Söderman, T., Kopperoinen, L., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Väre, S., & Kotze, D. J. (2010). Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: A Finland case study. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 3225-3243.
  • Önder, S., & Polat, A. T. (2012). Kentsel açık-yeşil alanların kent yaşamındaki yeri ve önemi. Kentsel Peyzaj Alanlarının Oluşumu ve Bakım Esasları Semineri, 19, 73-96.
  • Özdede, S., Kalonya, D. H., & Aygün, A. (2021). Pandemi sonrası dönemde kişi başına düşen kentsel yeşil alan ihtiyacını yeniden düşünmek. İdealkent, Sayı: COVID-19 Sonrası Kentsel Kamusal Mekânların Dönüşümü, 362-388. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/idealkent/issue/65127/843386
  • Resmi Gazete. (1985). Resmi Gazete (Official Gazette) 29030 Sayılı Plan Yapımına Ait Esaslara Dair Yönetmelik. Resmi Gazete. Access on: 24 June 2024. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/
  • Resmi Gazete. (1999). Resmi Gazete (Official Gazette) Tarih 23804 Sayılı İmar Yönetmeliği, Ankara. Resmi Gazete. Access on: 24 June 2024. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/
  • Resmi Gazete. (2014). Resmi Gazete (Official Gazette) Mekânsal Planlar Yapım Yönetmeliği. Resmi Gazete. Access on: 24 June2024.https://www.csb.gov.tr/TR-223019/Mekansal-Planlar-Yapim-Yonetmeligi.html
  • Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U. K., Randrup, T. B., & Troelsen, J., (2010). Influences on the use of urban green space- A case study in Odense, Denmark. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 9,1, 25-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.002
  • Şenik, B., & Uzun, O. (2022). A process approach to the open green space system planning. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 18(2), 203-219. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11355-021-00492-5
  • Tango, U., & Topçu, M. (2021). Kentsel donatı alanlarının erişilebilirlik analizi: Mardin Kızıltepe örneği. Türkiye Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Dergisi, 3(2), 104 - 115. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tucbis/issue/65820/944795
  • Thompson, C. W., (2002). Urban open-space in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning 60, 2, 59- 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00059-2
  • TÜİK. (2024). Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Access on: 10 May 2024. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/
  • Tülek, B., & Mirici, M. E. (2019). Kentsel sistemlerde yeşil altyapı ve ekosistem hizmetleri. Peyzaj, 1(2), 1-11. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/peyzaj/issue/51771/651252
  • Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., & Niemela, J. (2007). Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: A literature review. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81(3), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001
  • Van Doorn, N. S., & McPherson, E. G. (2018). Demographic trends in Claremont California’s street tree population. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 29, 200 - 211. https://research.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/50688
  • WHO. (2017). The World Health Organization (WHO) urban green spaces: A brief for action. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/344116/9789289052498-eng.pdf
  • Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J., & Newell, J. P. (2014). Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities "just green enough". Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017

Downloads


Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Uslu, D. Y., Almansouri, H. M. S., Elahsadi, A. H. M., & Cetin, M. (2024). Towards sustainable cities: Evaluating the distribution and functionality of green spaces in Atakum. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 5(3), 461–476. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i3143

Issue


Section

Research Articles