Bridging academia and practice: Evolving pedagogies in urban design education

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6si193

Keywords:

urban design pedagogy, urban design professional practice, urban design academic council, qualitative interviews, academia and practice

Abstract

Urban design education is confronting growing pressures to respond to increasingly complex urban, environmental, and socio-political challenges while remaining relevant to professional practice. This paper presents findings from a qualitative, interview-based study conducted by the Urban Design Academic Council (UDAC) between 2023 and 2025, drawing on semi-structured conversations with fourteen urban design practices operating across diverse institutional and geographic contexts in the United States. Rather than offering a comprehensive literature review of urban design pedagogy, the paper foregrounds practitioner perspectives as an empirical and practice-informed contribution to ongoing disciplinary discussions. The interviews examine professional expectations of urban design education, including desired skills, perceived gaps in graduate preparedness, emerging trends in practice, and opportunities for deeper collaboration between academia and the profession. Findings reveal consistent emphasis on strategic and systemic thinking, narrative and communicative competence, interdisciplinary fluency, and preparedness to engage climate resilience, equity, and infrastructural complexity at multiple scales. Practitioners also highlight the value of pedagogical models that integrate experiential learning, joint research initiatives, and sustained professional engagement within academic settings. By documenting and synthesizing practitioner insights, this study contributes a field-level snapshot of current professional priorities and challenges in urban design. The paper positions interview-based inquiry as both a research method and a pedagogical tool, offering an empirical foundation for future curriculum development, mixed-methods research, and cross-institutional collaboration aimed at strengthening the alignment between urban design education and contemporary practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Mona El Khafif, University of Virginia

    Mona El Khafif is an architect, urban designer, and committed educator. She is currently an Associate Professor at the University of Virginia School of Architecture, where she serves as a graduate program director for Urban Design. She received her professional architecture degree (Dipl. Ing. Architecture) from the RWTH in Aachen and her PhD in Urban Design from the University of Technology Vienna. She co-authored the award-winning URBANbuild: Local/Global (2009), published Staged Urbanism (2009, German edition), and recently co-edited Next New York (2022). Her work spans multiple scales, integrating temporal, typological, and collaborative strategies in both design, pedagogy, and writing.

  • Nico Larco, University of Oregon

    Nico Larco, AIA, is an urban designer, architect, and professor. He leads ELEMENT/Urban Design, a design and consulting firm, and is a Professor of Architecture and Urban Design at the University of Oregon, where he also directs the Urbanism Next Center and co-directs the Sustainable Cities Institute. Prof. Larco developed the Sustainable Urban Design Framework and is lead author of the Sustainable Urban Design Handbook (2024). His Urbanism Next work explores how technologies such as shared mobility, autonomous vehicles, e-commerce, and the sharing economy are reshaping cities. He serves as Strategic Advisor and researcher at TNO (Netherlands) and has worked with the EU, US Congress, and cities across North America and Europe.

References

Carmona, M. (2019). Design and the place-responsive city. Journal of Urban Design, 24(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1509970

Carmona, M., de Magalhães, C., & Hammond, L. (2008). Public space: The management dimension. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.

Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods (2nd ed.). Wiley.

Loukaitou-Sideris, A., & Mukhija, V. (2016). Responding to informality through urban design studio pedagogy. Journal of Urban Design, 21(5), 577-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2015.1071650

Urban Design Academic Council. (2025). Mission. UDAC. https://www.udacouncil.org/mission

Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial design education: New directions for pedagogy in architecture and beyond. Springer.

Savage, S. (2005). Urban design education: Learning for life in practice. Urban Design International, 10(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.udi.9000130

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

Issue

Section

Viewpoints

How to Cite

El Khafif, M., & Larco, N. (2025). Bridging academia and practice: Evolving pedagogies in urban design education. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 6(Special Issue), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6si193

Similar Articles

61-70 of 191

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.