Relative rhythms, urban oases, and spatial resilience / Exploring syntaxes of seclusion, solitude, and tranquility
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2si035Keywords:
rhythm analysis, space syntax, resilience, urbanity, urban designAbstract
This article engages with the role of what one might tentatively call “secondary” urban spaces, in that while they are public, they are not the most vibrant, populated, or active places. These are not the spaces envisioned in many project illustrations. They are not full of people and activity. They are however a crucial part of a wider texture of urban situations, and important to extending our understanding of seclusion, solitude, and tranquility beyond distant parks and recreation areas. My aim here is to understand the emergence of these spaces in-between; those that are close to the vibrant streets and are embedded in city centers yet which offer a respite from the most bustling urbanity. These spaces, I will argue, more easily allow for the kinds of interactions that can lead to bridging and bonding with the unknown, in addition to the important everyday encounters that occur on central streets and squares. Using qualitative methods which build on Lefebvre’s rhythmanalysis, the discussion will draw on observations of the syntactic properties that condition, enable, and characterize such spaces, and address a series of concepts, including capacity, insulation, sequencing, and interface. A better understanding of such places, it is argued, not only allows a richer set of tools for working with urban design and planning, but offers possibilities for more resilient planning in terms of generating social relations, the emergence of communities, and for cities to manage and withstand extraordinary conditions.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
References
- Abshirini, E., & Koch, D. (2017). Resilience, space syntax and spatial interfaces: The case of river cities. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 14(1), 25-41.
- Amin, A. (2008). Collective culture and urban public space. City, 12(1), 5-24.
- Anderson, J., Ruggeri, K., Steemers, K., & Huppert, F. (2016). Lively Social Space, Well-Being Activity, and Urban Design: Findings From a Low-Cost Community-Led Public Space Intervention. Environment and Behavior, 49(6), 685-716.
- Barthel, S., & Kyttä, M. (Eds.). (2020). Urbanization and Affordances that Promote Well-Being for (Urban) People and for a Healthy Biosphere: Frontiers Media.
- Biggs, R., Schlüter, M., & Schoon, M. L. (Eds.). (2015). Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystems Services in Social-Ecological Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bohman, H., Ryan, J., Stjernborg, V., & Nilsson, D. (2021). A study of changes in everyday mobility during the Covid-19 during the Covid-19 pandemic: As perceived by people living in Malmö, Sweden. Transport Policy, 106, 109-119.
- Brighenti, A. M., & Kärrholm, M. (2018). Beyond Rhythmanalysis: towards a territoriology of rhythms and melodies in everyday spatial activities. City, Territory and Architecture, 5(4).
- Brighenti, A. M., & Kärrholm, M. (2020). Animated lands: studies in territoriology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
- Butler, J. (2005). Giving an Account of Oneself. New York: Fordham University Press.
- Calefato, P. (2004). The Clothed Body (L. Adams, Trans.). Oxford: Berg.
- Carpenter, A. (2015). Resilience in the social and physical realms: Lessons from the Gulf Coast. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 14(3), 290-301.
- Choi, E. (2014). Walkability and the complexity of walking behavior. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 11(2), 87-99.
- Choi, E., & Koch, D. (2015). Movement and the connectivity of streets: A closer look at route distribution and pedestrian density. In K. Karimi, L. Vaughan, K. Sailer, G. Palaiologou, & T. Bolton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 65:61-65:11). London: UCL.
- Cutini, V., Farese, D., & Rabino, G. (2020). Configuration and resilience: some remarks from the cases of Florence and Milan. Plurimondi, 18, 35-51.
- de Beauvoir, S. (1965). The Prime of Life (P. Green, Trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
- de Holanda, F. (2017). Urban Fissures. Journal of Space Syntax, 7(2), 141-164.
- de la Fuente, P. P. (2015). Discrete Architectures: Rhythms of public eating in Värnhemstorget in Malmö. In M. Kärrholm (Ed.), Urban Squares: Spatio-temporal studies of design and everyday life in the Öresund region (pp. 57-86). Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
- Engström, G., & Gren, Å. (2017). Capturing the value of green space in urban parks in a sustainable urban planning and design context: pros and cons of hedonic pricing. Ecology and Society, 22(2), 21.
- Erixon Aalto, H., Marcus, L., & Torsvall, J. (2018). Towards a Social-Ecological Urbanism: Co-Producing Knowledge through Design in the Albano Resilient Campus Project in Stockholm. Sustainability, 10(3), 717.
- Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. A. (2003). Landscape planning and stress. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2(1), 1-18.
- Grosz, E. (1995). Space, time, and perversion: Essays on the politics of bodies. London: Routledge.
- Hanson, J. (1998). Decoding homes and houses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Hewitt, T. (2016). Rethinking Encounter: intercultural interactions between parents in Australia’s culturally diverse primary schools. Australian Geographer, 47(3), 355-370.
- Hillier, B. (1999). Centrality as a process: acounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 4(3-4), 107-127.
- Hillier, B. (2009). Spatial Sustainability in Cities: Organic Patterns and Sustainable Forms. In D. Koch, L. Marcus, & J. Steen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. K01:01-20). Stockholm: KTH.
- Hillier, B. (2016). What are cities for? And how does this relate to their spatial form? Journal of Space Syntax, 6(2), 199-212.
- Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Irschik, E., & Kail, E. (2013). Vienna: Progress Towards a Fair Shared City. In I. S. de Madariaga & M. Roberts (Eds.), Fair Shared Cities: The Impact of Gender Planning in Europe (pp. 193-230). London: Routledge.
- Kärrholm, M. (2012). Retailising Space: Architecture, Retail and the Territorialisation of Public Space. Burlington: Ashgate.
- Koch, D. (2016). On Avoidance: Reflections on Processes of Socio-spatial Structuring. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 4(2), 67-78.
- Koch, D. (2017). Memory, Projection, and Imagination: On Challenges for Observation and Statistics Based Research. Contour 2: Agents/Agency of Urbanity, 2(1), 1-15.
- Koch, D. (2021). The Bubble, the Arrow, and the Area: Urban Design and Diagrammatic Concepts of Human Action. In L. Medrano, L. Recaman, & T. Avermaete (Eds.), The New Urban Condition: Criticism and Theory from Architecture and Urbanism (pp. 183-208). London: Routledge.
- Koch, D., & Miranda, P. (2013). Syntactic Resilience. In Y. O. Kim, H. T. Park, & K. W. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 054:051-054:016). Seoul: Sejong University.
- Koch, D., & Sand, M. (2009). Rhythmanalysis – Rhythm as Mode, Methods and Theory for Analysing Urban Complexity. In A. Wesener & M. Aboutarabi (Eds.), Urban Design Research: Method and Application - Proceedings of the International Conference held at Birmingham City University 3-4 December 2009 (pp. 61-72). Birmingham: Birmingham City University.
- Kotschy, K., Biggs, R., Daw, T., Folke, C., & West, P. (2015). Princple 1 - Maintain diversity and redundancy. In R. Biggs, M. Schlüter, & M. L. Schoon (Eds.), Principles for Building Resilience: Sustaining Ecosystem Services in Social-Ecological Systems (pp. 50-79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (D. Nicholson-Smith, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
- Lefebvre, H. (1996a). Seen from the Window (E. Kofman & E. Lebas, Trans.). In E. Kofman & E. Lebas (Eds.), Writings on Cities (pp. 219-227). London: Blackwell.
- Lefebvre, H. (1996b). Writings on Cities (E. Lebas & E. Kofman, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Lefebvre, H. (2004). Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (S. Elden & G. Moore, Trans.). London: Continuum.
- Lefebvre, H., & Régulier, C. (2004). Attempt at the Rhythmanalysis of Mediterranean Cities (S. Elden & G. Moore, Trans.). In H. Lefebvre (Ed.), Rhythmanalysis: Space, time and everyday life (pp. 87-100). London: Continuum.
- Legeby, A. (2013). Patterns of Co-Presence: Spatial Configuration and Social Segregation. Stockholm: KTH.
- Legeby, A., & Koch, D. (2020). The changing of urban habits during the Corona pandemic in Sweden. FAMagazine, 52-53, 198-203.
- Ludvigsson, J. F. (2020). The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID-19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved. Acta Paediatrica, 109(12), 2459-2471.
- Marcus, L. (2000). Architectural knowledge and urban form: The functional performance of architectural urbanity. Stockholm: KTH.
- Marcus, L., Berghauser Pont, M., & Barthel, S. (2019). Towards a socio-ecological spatial morphology: integrating elements of urban morphology and landscape ecology. Urban Morphology, 23(2), 115-124.
- Minoura, E. (2016). Uncommon Ground: Urban Form and Social Territory. Stockholm: KTH.
- Netto, V. (2008). Practice, space, and the duality of meaning. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(2), 359-379.
- Okba, B., Cutini, V., Leccese, F., Salvadori, G., & Zemmouri, N. (2021). Relation between soundscape and spatial configuration in different urban contexts. INTER-NOISE and NOISE-CON Congress and Conference Proceedings, 263(5), 1405-1414.
- Osman, R., & Mulíček, O. (2017). Urban chronopolis: Ensemble of rhythmized dislocated places. Geoforum, 85, 46-57.
- Park, G., & Evans, G. W. (2016). Environmental stressors, urban design and planning: implications for human behaviour and health. Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), 453-470.
- Peponis, J. (2017). On the pedagogical functions of the city: a morphology of adolescence in Athens, 1967 – 1973. Journal of Space Syntax, 7(2), 219-251.
- Peponis, J., Feng, C., Green, D., Haynie, D., Kim, S. H., Sheng, Q., . . . Wang, H. (2015). Syntax and parametric analysis of superblock patterns. Journal of Space Syntax, 6(1), 109-141.
- Peponis, J., Park, J., & Feng, C. (2016). The city as an interface of scales: Gangnam urbanism. In S. H. Kim, E. Cinn, K. Ahn, S. Kim, I. Chung, D. E. Jeong, & R. Enos (Eds.), The FAR Game: Constraints Sparking Creativity (pp. 102-111). Seoul: SPACE books.
- Peponis, J., Ross, C., & Rashid, M. (1997). The Structure of Urban Space, Movement and Co-presence: The Case of Atlanta. Geoforum, 3-4, 341-358.
- Psarra, S. (2009). Architecture and narrative: The formation of space and cultural meaning. London: Routledge.
- Reid-Musson, E. (2018). Intersectional rhythmanalysis: Power, rhythm, and everyday life. Progress in Human Geography, 42(6), 881-897.
- Revol, C. (2019). Rue Rambuteau Today: Rhythmanalysis in Practice. Rhuthmos. Retrieved from https://rhuthmos.eu/spip.php?article549
- Roe, J., & McCay, L. (2021). Restorative Cities: Urban design for mental health and wellbeing. London: Bloomsbury.
- Samuelsson, K. (2021). Making space for resilient urban well-being. Gävle: Gävle University Press.
- Samuelsson, K., Barthel, S., Giusti, M., & Hartig, T. (2021). Visiting nearby natural settings supported wellbeing during Sweden’s “soft-touch” pandemic restrictions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 214, 104176.
- Sand, M. (2011). Gå vilse med punktlighet och precision: en guidebok A-Ö. Stockholm: ArkDes.
- Ståhle, A. (2008). Compact sprawl: Exploring public open space and contradictions in urban density. Stockholm: KTH.
- Stavroulaki, G., Bolin, D., Berghauser Pont, M., Marcus, L., & Håkansson, E. (2019). Statistical modelling and analysis of big data on pedestrian movement. In Proceedings of the 12th International Space Syntax Symposium (pp. 79.71-79.24). Beijing: Beijing Jiaotong University.
- Swanton, D. (2010). Flesh, metal, road: tracing the machinic geographies of race. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28, 447-466.
- United Nations. (2015). Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations
- Verschaffel, B. (2010). Guessing the Future of the Library. In H. H. van der Werf (Ed.), The Architecture of Knowledge: The library of the future (pp. 84-95). Rotterdam: NAi.
- Vincent, C., Neal, S., & Iqbal, H. (2018). Friendship and Diversity: Class, Ethnicity and Social Relationships in the City. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.
- Williams, J. P. (2011). Subcultural Theory: Traditions and Concepts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Zukin, S. (1995). The Cultures of Cities. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Zukin, S., & Kosta, E. (2004). Bourdieu Off-Broadway: Managing Distinctionon a Shopping Block in the East Village. City & Community, 3(2), 101-114.
Downloads
Published
2021-12-31
How to Cite
Koch, D. (2021). Relative rhythms, urban oases, and spatial resilience / Exploring syntaxes of seclusion, solitude, and tranquility. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2((Special Issue), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2si035
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Daniel Koch
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
