A comparative analysis of space efficiency in skyscrapers: Case studies from the Middle East, Asia, and North America

Authors

  • Özlem Nur Aslantamer image/svg+xml Atilim University

    Özlem Nur Aslantamer completed her Ph.D. in Landscape Architecture at the School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Ankara University, in 2021. With 26 years of combined experience in academia and the professional field of interior architecture & environmental design, she has established a robust foundation in her field. Since 2021, she has been serving as a full-time instructor at Atılım University, dedicating her expertise to both teaching and research endeavors.

  • Hüseyin Emre Ilgın image/svg+xml Tampere University

    Hüseyin Emre Ilgın received his Ph.D. (2018) in Building Sciences about tall building design in Architecture from METU in Ankara. Since December 2019, he has been conducting post-doctoral research on wood construction at Tampere University. Dr. Ilgın worked as a Marie Skłodowska-Curie postdoctoral research fellow on dovetailed massive wood board elements for 2 years between 2021-2023.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i1154

Keywords:

Middle East, Asia, North America, Skyscraper, space efficiency, comparison

Abstract

This study conducts a critical comparative analysis of spatial efficiency in supertall buildings across three major geographic contexts: the Middle East, Asia, and North America. Through the examination of selected case studies representative of each region, the research investigates the interplay between architectural form, structural typology, and the distribution of usable floor area within vertical structures. The findings reveal significant regional variations in spatial efficiency metrics and core-to-GFA (gross floor area) proportions. In the Asian context, towers predominantly adopt a tapered morphological strategy combined with composite structural systems, resulting in an average spatial efficiency of approximately 68%, with vertical service cores occupying nearly 30% of the GFA. Conversely, Middle Eastern high-rises, typically defined by prismatic massing and monolithic concrete structures, demonstrate a higher spatial efficiency—averaging 76%—with a core-to-GFA ratio of around 21%. North American skyscrapers, frequently employing prismatic or setback configurations alongside reinforced concrete systems, exhibit comparable efficiency rates, with an average of 76% and a similarly proportioned core area. Despite these regional divergences, the analysis identifies a consistent inverse correlation between building height and spatial efficiency, underscoring the technical and spatial challenges associated with height-induced inefficiencies in high-rise design. By elucidating these interregional patterns, the study offers valuable insights into the optimization of vertical spatial organization, contributing to the evolving discourse on high-rise architecture and urban densification.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Al-Kodmany, K. (2024). Refashioning cities in the Middle East: The case of Dubai. International Journal of High-Rise Buildings, 13(1), 11–32.
  • Arslan Kılınç, G. (2019). Improving a model for determining space efficiency of tall office buildings. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Architecture, Mimar Sinan Fine Art University, Istanbul, Turkey. (In Turkish).
  • Aslantamer, Ö. N., & Ilgın, H. E. (2024a). Evaluating space efficiency of tall buildings in Turkey. Buildings, 14(7), 2138.
  • Aslantamer, Ö. N., & Ilgın, H. E. (2024b). Space efficiency in tall hotel towers. Buildings, 14, 2051.
  • Barr, J., & Jedwab, R. (2023). Exciting, boring, and nonexistent skylines: Vertical building gaps in global perspective. Real Estate Economics, 51(6), 1512–1546.
  • Botti, G. (2023). The skyscraper: Go East, go high, go hybrid. In Designing Emerging Markets: A Quantitative History of Architectural Globalisation (pp. 163–248). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  • Chaudhary, N. (2024). Construction of skyscrapers: Boon or bane from an economic perspective. Journal of Tikapur Multiple Campus, 7(1–2), 69–84.
  • CTBUH Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat. (2024). Illinois Institute of Technology, S.R. Crown Hall, 3360 South State Street, Chicago, Illinois, USA. Available online: www.ctbuh.org (Accessed on 26 August 2024).
  • Goessler, T., & Kaluarachchi, Y. (2023). Smart adaptive homes and their potential to improve space efficiency and personalisation. Buildings, 13, 1132.
  • Hamid, G. M., Elsawi, M., & Yusra, O. (2022). The impacts of spatial parameters on space efficiency in hybrid villa-apartments in Greater Khartoum, Sudan. Journal of Architecture and Planning, 34, 425–440.
  • Höjer, M., & Mjörnell, K. (2018). Measures and steps for more efficient use of buildings. Sustainability, 10(1949).
  • Ibrahimy, R., Mohmmand, M. A., & Elham, F. A. (2023). An evaluation of space use efficiency in residential houses, Kabul City. Journal of Research in Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 2, 1–6.
  • Ilgın, H. E. (2021a). Space efficiency in contemporary supertall residential buildings. Architecture, 1, 25–37.
  • Ilgın, H. E. (2021b). Space efficiency in contemporary supertall office buildings. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 27, 4021024.
  • Ilgın, H. E. (2023a). An analysis of space efficiency in Asian supertall towers. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 41, 237–253.
  • Ilgın, H. E. (2023b). A study on space efficiency in contemporary supertall mixed-use buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 69, 106223.
  • Ilgın, H. E. (2024). Examination of spatial efficiency in super-tall towers within the Middle Eastern context. Open House International. (E-pub ahead of print).
  • Ilgın, H. E., & Aslantamer, Ö. N. (2024). Space efficiency in North American skyscrapers. Buildings, 14, 2382.
  • Kim, H., & Elnimeiri, M. (2004). Space efficiency in multi-use tall buildings. In Proceedings of the Tall Buildings in Historical Cities-Culture and Technology for Sustainable Cities, Seoul, Republic of Korea (10–13 October 2004).
  • Nam, H. J., & Shim, J. H. (2016). An analysis of the change in space efficiency based on various tall building corner shapes and lease spans. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea: Planning and Design, 32, 13–20.
  • Noor, K. B. M. (2008). Case study: A strategic research methodology. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5(11), 1602–1604.
  • Opoku, A., Ahmed, V., & Akotia, J. (2016). Research methodology in the built environment. Choosing an Appropriate Research Method, 32–49.
  • Pitroda, J., & Singh, J. R. (2016). Evolution of super tall and super slender skyscrapers structural systems in conjunction with architectural forms and aesthetics. In Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering: Issues, Opportunities, and Challenges for Development (Vol. 9, pp. 206–222).
  • Radović, V. (2020). Density through the prism of supertall residential skyscrapers: Urbo-architectural type in global megacities. Sustainability, 12(4), 1314.
  • Saari, A., Tissari, T., Valkama, E., & Seppänen, O. (2006). The effect of a redesigned floor plan, occupant density, and the quality of indoor climate on the cost of space, productivity, and sick leave in an office building: A case study. Building and Environment, 41, 1961–1972.
  • Saroglou, T., Theodosiou, T., Itzhak-Ben-Shalom, H., Vanunu, A. Y., Multanen, V., Isaac, S., & Meir, I. A. (2023). Skyscrapers and the city: How tall buildings interact with their users and urban environment. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 436, p. 01005). EDP Sciences.
  • Sev, A., & Özgen, A. (2009). Space efficiency in high-rise office buildings. METU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 26, 69–89.
  • Suga, R. (2021). Space efficiency in hotel development. Master’s Thesis, MODUL University Vienna, Austria.
  • Szołomicki, J., & Golasz-Szołomicka, H. (2021). Analysis of technical problems in modern super-slim high-rise residential buildings. Budownictwo i Architektura, 20(1), 083–116.
  • Tuure, A., & Ilgın, H. E. (2023). Space efficiency in Finnish mid-rise timber apartment buildings. Buildings, 13, 2094.
  • Von Both, P. (2019). A stakeholder-and function-based planning method for space-efficient buildings. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 323, 012040.
  • Zhang, L., Zhang, L., & Wang, Y. (2016). Shape optimization of free-form buildings based on solar radiation gain and space efficiency using a multi-objective genetic algorithm in the severe cold zones of China. Solar Energy, 132, 38–50.

Downloads


Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Aslantamer, Özlem N., & Ilgın, H. E. (2025). A comparative analysis of space efficiency in skyscrapers: Case studies from the Middle East, Asia, and North America. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 6(1), 01–19. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i1154

Issue


Section

Research Articles