Earthquake resilience of densely populated settlements: A strategic approach to mitigate Istanbul’s earthquake risk
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2025.v6i1156Keywords:
earthquake prone cities, earthquake resistance, sustainability, strategic urban planning, densely populated settlementsAbstract
One of the most significant challenges confronted by earthquake-prone cities results from the urban planning strategies and interventions preferred during the construction and development efforts. The planning of infrastructure that will serve the increasing population is even more important, especially in cities that have historical importance and have evolved into large metropolises in a short time. Proper planning and renewal efforts that align with earthquake-resistant urban development strategies not only add value for all stakeholders but also help avoid significant material and moral losses caused by poorly planned urban development. Although earthquake-prone settlements have thousands of years of construction traditions, these traditions have often been replaced by modern construction techniques nowadays. In cities where the transformation from traditional to modern construction techniques is rapid and uncontrolled, a severe earthquake is more likely to cause a significant damage. Türkiye has a high earthquake risk due to its geographical location. The Main Marmara Fault is an active fault line that poses a serious threat to Istanbul. The devastating earthquake series along the East Anatolian Fault in February 2023 have once again highlighted the urgency of taking necessary precautions and preparations for the anticipated Marmara earthquake. Istanbul is one of the most historically significant metropolises in the world. Accordingly, the city has expanded by receiving immigration since the last major earthquake. Given its unique place in world history and its centuries-old role as the capital of great civilizations, it is crucial to ensure the seismic resilience in Istanbul to protect both the lives and property of its dense population and to safeguard its cultural heritage sites. The aims of this paper are to evaluate the current characteristics of Istanbul in the event of a possible earthquake, to identify potential challenges of the city and to put forward a strategic approach to improve seismic resistance of the city. The evaluation was carried out by conducting a SWOT analysis based on the physical, environmental, social and economic conditions of the city. For this purpose, firstly the previous and current urban design practices adopted in the city was evaluated. The key features effective in the construction of an earthquake resilient settlement was emphasized and taken into consideration. Besides, the crucial stakeholders and their potential contributions were also evaluated. In this context, the problems that needs to be improved are revealed and a conceptual framework of an urban planning strategy is presented to construct an earthquake resilient city that provides satisfaction to all its stakeholders.
Metrics
References
- Alizadeh, M., Zabihi, H., Rezaie, F., Asadzadeh, A., Wolf, I. D., Langat, P. K., Khosravi, I., Pour, A. B., Nataj, M. M., & Pradhan, B. (2021). Earthquake vulnerability assessment for urban areas using an ANN and hybrid SWOT-QSPM model. Remote Sensing, 13(22), 4519.
- Ambraseys, N. N., & Finkel, C. F. (1991). Long‐term seismicity of Istanbul and of the Marmara Sea region. Terra Nova, 3(5), 527-539.
- Anadolu Ajansı. (2018, August, 17). Turkey marks 19th anniversary of Marmara Quake. AA https://www.aa.com.tr/en/info/infographic/11211
- Angell, E. (2015). A seismic cityscape: Earthquakes in Istanbul’s history. History of Istanbul. https://istanbultarihi.ist/396-a-seismic-cityscape-earthquakes-in-istanbuls-history
- Arslan, O., & Kayaalp, E. (2018) Belirsizliğin bilimi: Beklenen İstanbul Depremi ve uzmanlar antropolojisi [The science of uncertainty: The expected Istanbul earthquake and an anthropology of experts]. Toplum ve Bilim, 144. Available from: https://iletisim.com.tr/dergiler/toplum-vebilim/3/sayi-144-2018-bilim-teknoloji-toplum/10013 [Accessed 10th September 2021].
- Arya, A. S., Boen, T., & Ishiyama, Y. (2014). Guidelines for earthquake resistant non-engineered construction. UNESCO.
- Balyemez, S., & Berköz L. (2005). Hasar görebilirlik ve kentsel deprem davranışı. İTÜ Dergisi/a, Mimarlık, Planlama, Tasarım, 4(1), 3-14.
- Barnes, T. D. (1981). Constantine and Eusebius. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. https://archive.org/details/constantineeuseb0000barn
- Correia, M., Dipasquale, L., & Mecca, S. (2014). Versus: Heritage for tomorrow: Vernacular knowledge for sustainable architecture (p. 288). Firenze University Press.
- Erdik, M. (2005). Earthquake risk, earthquake rapid response system, and early warning system in Istanbul. Macalester International, 15(1), 99-124.
- Erdik, M., & Durukal, E. (2008). Earthquake risk and its mitigation in Istanbul. Natural Hazards, 44, 181-197.
- Ferah, F. E. (2009). 1755 Lisbon earthquake and protection of cultural heritage from future earthquakes / With a comparative study about earthquake and risk preparedness in Istanbul. (Master's thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya).
- Gayatri, S. (2023, May, 11). Turkey’s 300-year-old “eco-mansions”. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20230510-turkeys-300-year-old-eco-mansions
- Gibson, M., & Gökşin, Z. A. (2016). Neighbourhood regeneration in Istanbul–from earthquake mitigation to planned displacement and gentrification. International Planning History Society Proceedings, 17(2).
- Güçhan, N. Ş. (2007). Observations on earthquake resistance of traditional timber-framed houses in Turkey. Building and Environment, 42(2), 840-851.
- Güçhan, N. Ş. (2018). History and characteristics of construction techniques used in traditional timber Ottoman houses. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 12(1), 1-20.
- Günay, R. (2017). İstanbul'un kaybolan ahşap konutları. Yem Yayın.
- Güney, K. M. (2024). Earthquake, disaster capitalism and massive urban transformation in Istanbul. The Geographical Journal, 190, e12496. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12496
- History.com Editors. (2017, December 6), Constantinople, History. https://www.history.com/articles/constantinople
- Kaçar, T. (2003, May, 23-25). Üsküdar Savaşı ve Bizans’ın Temelleri [Conference session]. I. Uskudar Symposium, Istanbul, Türkiye. https://www.uskudar.bel.tr/userfiles/files/1.sempozyum_cilt_1.pdf
- Kadıköy Akademi. (2020, June, 24). Kentsel yoğunluk ve Kadıköy. Kadıköy Belediyesi Akademi. https://www.kadikoyakademi.org/prof-dr-murat-guvenc-ile-kentsel-yogunluk-ve-kadikoy-uzerine-soylesi/
- Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırmaları Enstitüsü (KOERI). (2019). İstanbul İli Olası Deprem Kayıp Tahminlerinin Güncellenmesi Projesi (Updating the Earthquake Loss Estimation for Istanbul). Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (IMM).
- Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırmaları Enstitüsü (KOERI). (2021). İstanbul deprem hızlı müdahale ve erken uyarı sistemi raporu. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Kandilli Rasathanesi ve Deprem Araştırma Enstitüsü Deprem Mühendisliği Ana Bilim Dalı. https://8luvomezzzsk.merlincdn.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/IERREWS-Rapor.pdf
- Kayaalp, E. (2024). Engineering, law, and the anticipated İstanbul earthquake. New Perspectives on Turkey, 1-17.
- Kuban, D. (2017). Türk ahşap konut mimarisi: 17.-19. yüzyıllar. Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
- Kundak, S. (2017). Enhance household resilience in Istanbul. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 8(1), 40-57.
- Labatt, A. (2004, October). Constantinople after 1261. The Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History. http://www.metmuseum.org/toah/hd/cnst/hd_cnst.htm
- Langenbach, R. (2010, July 4-7). Rescuing the baby from the bathwater: Traditional masonry as earthquake-resistant construction [Conference session]. 8th International Masonry Conference. Dresden, Germany.
- Sarıbıyık, M., Mansur, S., Fırat, S., & Aydın, F. (2003, December 18-20). Investigation of concrete quality of collapsed heavily damaged structures during the Marmara Earthquake [Conference session]. 8th International Conference on Inspection, Appraisal, Repairs, and Maintenance of Structures, Singapore.
- Şengör, A. C., & Kındap, T. (2019). The geology and geomorphology of Istanbul. In: Kuzucuoğlu, C., Çiner, A., Kazancı, N. (eds). Landscapes and landforms of Turkey, (pp. 249-263). Springer. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03515-0_10
- Şengör, A. C., & Zabcı, C. (2019). The north Anatolian fault and the north Anatolian shear zone. In: Kuzucuoğlu, C., Çiner, A., Kazancı, N. (eds). Landscapes and landforms of Turkey, (pp. 481-494). Springer. Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03515-0_27
- TUIK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu). (2024, February, 6). Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi sonuçları, 2023. TUIK. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayali-Nufus-Kayit-Sistemi-Sonuclari-2023-49684
- Türkiye İmar Kadastro. (2014). İl ve ilçe yüzölçümleri. https://www.imarkadastro.com/userfiles/file/Dokuman/il_ilce_alanlari.pdf
- Ündül, Ö., & Tuğrul, A. (2006, September, 6-10). The engineering geology of Istanbul, Turkey [Conference session]. Proceedings of International Association for Engineering Geology and the Environment (IAEG), Nottingham, United Kingdom.
- Ürekli, F. (2010). Osmanlı döneminde İstanbul’da meydana gelen afetlere ilişkin literatür. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, (16), 101-130.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gülru Koca
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.