A comparative impact chain analysis of 1999 Kocaeli and 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes

Authors

  • Caglar Goksu image/svg+xml Istanbul Technical University

    Caglar Goksu is an Associate Professor at Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University. Her research interests include seismic behavior, dynamic behavior, retrofitting and sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures. She has expertise on developing fragility functions, which are critical in terms of disaster management. She is the co-editor of an international book published by Springer, titled “Advances in Assessment and Modeling of Earthquake Loss”.

  • Seda Kundak image/svg+xml Istanbul Technical University

    Prof. Seda Kundak received her Ph.D. (2006) in Urban Planning about earthquake risk analysis from ITU. She completed her postdoctoral research at the Politecnico di Milano. Between 2008-2009, she contributed to the preparation of consultancy and training materials in the ISMEP project. She was a board member of the Society for Risk Analysis-Europe between 2012-2020 and she was the president of SRA-Europe between 2017-2019. In 2017, she was awarded the international Distinguished Lecturer award by the Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) and Sigma-Xi for her work on risk issues and contributions to science. In 2022, she received the SRA Fellow award for his work in the field of risk analysis and his initiatives to bring together risk researchers, especially in the Eastern and Southeastern Europe.

  • Kerem Yavuz Arslanlı image/svg+xml Istanbul Technical University

    Assoc.Prof.Dr. Kerem Yavuz Arslanlı is employed at Istanbul Technical University Department of Urban and Regional Planning. He worked at ITU Urban and Environmental Planning and Research Center from 2002-2012. His PhD, "Spatially Autoregressive House Price Index Model for Istanbul Metropolitan Area” won AREUEA 2009 Doctoral Session Grant. He worked at the University of Alicante Institute of International Economics in 2010 and at Cass Business School Department of Finance in 2011. After completing his PhD, he has started lectures on “Real Estate Finance & Investment” and “Real Estate Modeling and Forecasting”, at İ.T.Ü. Real Estate Development Master Programme. He has academic articles in international/national journals and several conference papers in international conferences. He has been a member of the European Real Estate Society (ERES) board of directors and President of 2016-17, Europe's leading real estate research and education organisation (www.eres.org).

  • Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı image/svg+xml Istanbul Technical University

    Ahmet Atıl Aşıcı has been working as an associate professor at the Management Engineering department at Istanbul Technical University since 2009. He holds a BSc degree from Istanbul Technical University (1992-1996), MA degree from Bogazici University in Economics (1997-1999), and a PhD degree in Economics from the Graduate Institute of International Studies, University of Geneva (2000-2007). Aşıcı worked as an associate economic officer at UNCTAD between 2005 and 2006. Aşıcı’s research focuses on the relationship between economic growth and sustainability, and green transformation of the economy. His articles appeared in various journals including Ecological Indicators, Journal of Happiness Studies, and Environment Development and Sustainability. Aşıcı was a climate change fellow in the 2020-2021 IPC-Mercator Fellowship program with a project titled Green New Deal for Turkey to tackle climate change.

  • Duygu Kalkanlı image/svg+xml Istanbul Technical University

    Duygu Kalkanlı received her BSc (2015) and MA (2019) degrees from Middle East Technical University, specializing in urban design, spatial behavior and morphological dynamics. She has been working as a research assistant and PhD candidate at ITU Department of Urban and Regional Planning. She is currently a Tübitak PhD abroad scholar and a visiting researcher at the University of Twente, where she continues her PhD thesis research on the spatial behavioral dimensions of urban resilience.

  • Ali Yılmaz image/svg+xml Istanbul Technical University

    Ali Yilmaz, a Ph.D. Candidate at Istanbul Technical University, is a proficient urban and regional planner specializing in urban design and spatial data analysis. His academic background includes a Master's in Urban Design (2022) and a Bachelor's in Urban and Regional Planning (2018). With a blend of academic and practical experiences in urban planning, including serving as research assistant in ITU, Ali exhibits an understanding of urban development dynamics.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4si109

Keywords:

cascading effect, earthquake, impact chain, resilience, systemic risk

Abstract

Resilience in the face of crises is crucial for minimizing the impact of disasters and enabling rapid recovery. This study delves into the interlinked consequences of two seismic events that significantly impacted Türkiye in 1999 and 2023. Using an impact chain analysis, the aim is to provide a thorough understanding of the extensive effects on structures, infrastructure, and socio-economic dynamics. The research also examines the evolution of disaster management practices from the 1999 Kocaeli Earthquake to the more recent seismic events in 2023, highlighting advancements in risk management and resilience. Structurally, both seismic events revealed vulnerabilities in building design, emphasizing seismic shortcomings that led to widespread damage. Earthquakes exert a profound impact on critical infrastructure, affecting transportation, communication, and energy systems, with cascading effects that extend to the broader socio-economic landscape. The effectiveness of the methodology, particularly, the Impact Chain analysis, is emphasized as it reveals complex causal relationships. Visual representations support effective communication and collaboration among stakeholders, offering a holistic perspective on systemic risks. In conclusion, this study contributes to understanding disaster resilience and provides a foundation for subsequent research, policy formulation, and pragmatic strategies for disaster preparedness and response.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Altinok, Y., Tinti, S., Alpar, B., Yalciner, A. C., Ersoy, Ş., Bortolucci, E., & Armigliato, A. (2001). The tsunami of August 17, 1999 in Izmit bay, Turkey. Natural Hazards, 24, 133-146.
  • Avcil, F., Işık, E., İzol, R., Büyüksaraç, A., Arkan, E., Arslan, M. H., ... & Harirchian, E. (2023). Effects of the February 6, 2023, Kahramanmaraş earthquake on structures in Kahramanmaraş city. Natural Hazards, 1-39.
  • BETAM (2023). 6 Şubat 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremlerinin Ekonomik Etkisi, Araştırma Notu 23/270, İstanbul.https://betam.bahcesehir.edu.tr/2023/03/6-subat-2023-kahramanmaras-depremlerinin-ekonomik-etkisi/.
  • Binici, B., Yakut, A., Kadas, K., Demirel, O., Akpinar, U., Canbolat, A., ... & Canbay, E. (2023). Performance of RC buildings after Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: lessons toward performance based design. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 1-12.
  • BTK 2023 https://www.btk.gov.tr/uploads/pages/iletisim-hizmetleri-istatistikleri/haber-bulteni-2022-4-645b55bbf3b40.pdf.
  • Celep, Z., Erken, A., Taskin, B., & Ilki, A. (2011). Failures of masonry and concrete buildings during the March 8, 2010 Kovancılar and Palu (Elazığ) earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(3), 868-889.
  • Cruz, A.M., Steinberg, L.J., Arellano, A.L.V., Nordvik, J.P., & Pisano, F. (2004). State of the Art in Natech Risk Management. European Commission Directorate General Joint Research Centre, EUR 21292 EN.
  • Demir, U., Goksu, C., Unal, G., Green, M., & Ilki, A. (2020a). Effect of fire damage on seismic behavior of cast-in-place reinforced concrete columns. Journal of Structural Engineering, 146(11), 04020232.
  • Demir, U., Goksu, C., Binbir, E., & Ilki, A. (2020b). Impact of time after fire on post-fire seismic behavior of RC columns. In Structures, 26, 537-548.
  • Demir, U., Unal, G., Goksu, C., Saribas, I., & Ilki, A. (2022). Post-fire seismic behavior of RC columns built with sustainable concrete. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(13), 6869-6892.
  • Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency (AFAD) of Ministry of Interior Affairs of Türkiye (2023). 06 February 2023 Pazarcik-Elbistan (Kahramanmaraş) Mw: 7.7 – Mw: 7.6 earthquakes report. [in Turkish].
  • Durukal, E., & Erdik, M. (2008). Physical and economic losses sustained by the industry in the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake. Nat Hazards 46, 153–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9218-6.
  • Dündar, M.S., & Altundağ, H. (2002) Heavy metal determination of house dust in Adapazari, Turkey, after earthquake. Trace Elements and Electrolytes 19(2):55-58.
  • Dündar, M.S., & Pala, M.F. (2003) Monitoring of lead, zinc, cadmium, nickel, chromium and copper in street dust samples in Adapazarı, Turkey, after earthquake, Trace Elements and Electrolytes, 20(2):104-107.
  • Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) (2023). February 6, 2023 Türkiye earthquakes:Report on geoscience and engineering impacts, https://10.18118/G6PM34.
  • Girgin, S. (2011). The natech events during the 17 August 1999 Kocaeli earthquake: aftermath and lessons learned. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 11(4), 1129-1140.
  • Gurbuz T., Cengiz, A., Kolemenoglu, S., Demir, C., & Ilki, A. (2023). Damages and failures of structures in Izmir (Turkey) during the October 30, 2020 Aegean Sea earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 27(6): 1565-1606.
  • Ilki, A., & Celep, Z. (2012) Earthquakes, existing buildings and seismic design codes in Turkey. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 37:365-380.
  • Integrated Research on Disaster Risk. (2011). Forensic Investigations of Disasters: The FORIN Project (IRDR FORIN Publication No. 1). Beijing: Integrated Research on Disaster Risk.
  • Kumu. (n.d.). Kumu. https://kumu.io/, last accessed 2023/12/01.
  • Kundak, S. (2010). Estimation of economic losses according to the earthquake scenarios for Istanbul. In Risks Challenging Publics, Scientists and Governments (pp. 173-184). CRC Press.
  • Law on Building Inspection. (2001). Official Gazette of Republic of Türkiye, No: 4708, 29.06.2001.
  • Ministry of Environment, Urbanisation and Climate Change (MoEUCC) of Türkiye. https://csb.gov.tr.
  • Miro | The Visual Workspace for Innovation. (n.d.). https://miro.com/, last accessed 2023/12/01.
  • Oliver-Smith, A., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Burton, I., & Lavell, A. (2019). Forensic Investigations of Disasters (FORIN).
  • Özmen, B. (2000) 17 Ağustos 1999 İzmit Körfezi Depremi’nin Hasar Durumu. Turkish Earthquake Foundation.
  • PARATUS Project. (2023). Deliverable 1.1 Report on participatory workshops in the four application case study sites, including impact chains diagrams for each analysed event. https://www.paratus-project.eu/portfolio-items/d1-1/?portfolioCats=4#.
  • Pittore, M., Zebisch, M., Cocuccioni, S., Renner, K., Fruchter, S., & Schneiderbauer, S. (2023). Impact Chains - Guideline and specifications v1.0. EURAC Research, Bolzano.
  • Scawthorn, C. (2000). The Marmara, Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999: Reconnaissance Report. In The Marmara, Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999: Reconnaissance report.
  • Sezen, H., Elwood, K. J., Whittaker, A. S., Mosalam, K. M., Wallace, J. W., & Stanton, J. F. (2000). Structural engineering reconnaissance of the August 17, 1999, Kocaeli (Izmit), Turkey, earthquake. Technical Rep. No., PEER 2000, 9.
  • Sönmez M, İstanbul’un İki Yüzü: 1980’den 2000’e Değişim, 1996, Ankara.
  • Steinberg, L.J., & Cruz, A.M. (2004). When Natural and Technological Disasters Collide: Lessons from the Turkey Earthquake of August 17, 1999. Natural Hazards Review, 5(3):121-130.
  • Strategy and Budget Office (SBO) of Presidency of Türkiye (2023). 2023 Kahramanmaraş and Hatay earthquakes report.
  • Tapan, M., Comert, M., Demir, C., Sayan, Y., Orakcal, K., & Ilki, A. (2013). Failures of structures during the October 23, 2011 Tabanlı (Van) and November 9, 2011 Edremit (Van) earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis, 34, 606-628.
  • TEPAV (2023). İstihdam İzleme Bülteni, Sayı: 132. https://www.tepav.org.tr/upload/files/1693194147-5.TEPAV_istihdam_izleme_Bulteni_Mayis2023.pdf
  • TS500 Requirements for Design and Construction of Reinforced Concrete Structures. (2000). Turkish Standards Institution. Ankara, Türkiye.
  • TUBITAK-BILGEM (2001) Bilgi Teknolojileri Yaygınlik ve Kullanim Araştırması -2000, Bilgi Teknolojileri ve Elektronik Arastirma Enstitüsü. Ankara, TUBITAK, BİLGEM.
  • TURKONFED (2023). 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremi - Afet Ön Değerlendirme Durum Raporu, https://turkonfed.org/tr/detay/3937/2023-kahramanmaras-depremi-afet-on-degerlendirme-durum-raporu
  • TÜİK 2023. Foreign Trada Statistics, Ankara Türkiye.
  • Türkiye Building Earthquake Code (TBEC). (2018). Official Gazette of Republic of Türkiye, No: 30364, 18 March 2018.
  • Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi (T.B.M.M.). (2010). Parliamentary Investigation Commission Report Established for Researching Earthquake Risk and Determining Necessary Measures for Earthquake Management. https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/sirasayi/donem23/yil01/ss549.pdf.
  • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction – UNDRR (2019) Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction.
  • Weizman, E., Tavares, P., Schuppli, S., & Studio, S. (2010). Forensic architecture. Architectural Design, 80(5), 58–63.
  • World Bank (1999). Marmara Earthquake Assessment. 27380. Turkey Country Office.
  • Zebisch, M., Terzi, S., Pittore, M., Renner, K., & Schneiderbauer, S. (2022). Climate impact chains—a conceptual modelling approach for climate risk assessment in the context of adaptation planning. In Climate adaptation modelling (pp. 217-224). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Downloads


Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Goksu, C., Kundak, S., Arslanlı, K. Y., Aşıcı, A. A., Kalkanlı, D., & Yılmaz, A. (2023). A comparative impact chain analysis of 1999 Kocaeli and 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 4((Special Issue), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4si109

Issue


Section

Resilience in Crisis


Funding data