How local street networks contribute to the traffic accident occurrence: Mersin city case

Authors

  • Fikret Zorlu image/svg+xml Mersin University

    Fikret Zorlu received his BSc. degree in City and Regional Panning from Middle East Technical University, Faculty of Architecture (1991-1996). Zorlu received his MSc, and PhD. degrees in City and Regional Panning from Middle East Technical University, School of Natural and Applied Sciences (1996-2006). Major research interests include urban transportation, city logistics and urban design. Zorlu has also conducted many research projects about urban design, urban transport and logistics. He contributed to published articles to many national and international publications and has received various awards in urban design and architectural design competitions. He teaches urban transportation, urban project management and planning studio courses at Mersin University.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i3025

Keywords:

traffic safety, Mersin, street pattern, traffic accidents, street network design

Abstract

In this study, the issue of the accident frequency/occurrence in local residential streets where vehicle counts are not obtained is discussed. The accident reports received from the Ministry of Interior include fatal and injury accidents. But since the number of deadly accidents is minor, a binomial regression was not employed in the statistical analysis. This study investigates the role of morphological characteristics of the street network where main arterials are excluded in the safety of residential neighborhoods of Mersin, Turkey. Results showed that commercial and industrial uses generate more traffic than residential neighborhoods, therefore, responsible for higher rates of accidents. The number of vehicles, employment, and population increase the accident rate. Empirical model results showed that population density, street length per capita (meters), and number of intersections significantly affect accident occurrence. Number of intersections increases accident frequencies while street length per capita reduces. In contrast, the number of links, street density, link to node ratio, and average link length have no significant effect on accident occurrence. Traffic safety cannot be achieved if the street length is not proportional to the number of vehicles. In addition, street design is also a matter of efficient use of urban space.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Boğaziçi Proje (2015), Mersin Transport Master Plan, Mersin Metropolitan Municipality.
  • Giacomin. D. J. & Levinson. D. M. (2015). Road network circuity in metropolitan areas. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 42(6). 1040-1053.
  • Haggett. P. & Chorley. R. J. (1969). Network analysis in geography (Vol. 1). Hodder Education.
  • Háznagy. A. & Fi. I. (2016). Comparing the road networks of residential areas. Pollack Periodica. 11(3). 61-72.
  • Kansky. K.J. (1963). Structure of Transportation Networks: Relations Between Network Geometry and Regional Characteristics (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis). University of Chicago.
  • Litman. T. (2005) Roadway connectivity: Creating more connected roadway and pathway networks. 20.9.2021 tarihinde http://www.vtpi.org/tdm/tdm116.htm adresinden erişildi.
  • Marshall. W. Garrick. N. (2010) Street network types and road safety: A study of 24 California cities. Urban Design International 15. 133-147. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2009.31
  • Marshall. W. E. & Garrick. N. W. (2011). Does street network design affect traffic safety?. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 43(3). 769-781.
  • Özen. M. (2020). Dört Kollu Sinyalize Kentsel Kavşaklarda Trafik Kazalarının Sıklığını Etkileyen Faktörlerin İncelenmesi. Teknik Dergi. 31 (3). 10033-10053 . DOI: 10.18400/tekderg.509128.
  • Sharifi. A. (2019). Resilient urban forms: A review of literature on streets and street networks. Building and Environment. 147. 171-187.
  • Soltani. A. & Allan. A. (2005). A computer methodology for evaluating urban areas for walking. cycling and transit suitability: four case studies from suburban Adelaide. Australia. In Proceedings. 8th Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management Conference.
  • Southworth. M. & Ben-Joseph. E. (1995). Street standards and the shaping of suburbia. Journal of the American Planning Association. 61(1). 65-81.
  • Southworth. M. & Ben-Joseph. E. (2013). Streets and the Shaping of Towns and Cities. Island Press.
  • Taylor. J. (2001) Transportation and community design: The effects of land use and street pattern on travel behavior. Technical Bulletin. 11:1-4. 21.9.2021 tarihinde http://www.jtc.sala.ubc.ca/bulletins/TB_issue_11_Transportation_edit.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
  • Zadeh. Where. M. & Rajabi. M. A. (2013). Analyzing the effect of the street network configuration on the efficiency of an urban transportation system. Cities. 31. 285-297.
  • Zhang. M. (2013). On the Cul-de-Sac vs. Checker-board street network: Search for sustainable urban form. International review for spatial planning and sustainable development.1(1). 1-16.

Downloads


Published

2021-12-29

How to Cite

Zorlu, F. (2021). How local street networks contribute to the traffic accident occurrence: Mersin city case. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2(3), 280–294. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i3025

Issue


Section

Research Articles