Village institutes as a design approach

Nilgün Kuloğlu; Ali Osman Asasoğlu

doi:10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2023

Village institutes as a design approach

Authors

Nilgün Kuloğlu Short Bio Karadeniz Technical University

Nilgün Kuloğlu was born in 1963, in Ankara, Turkey. She graduated from Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Architecture, in 1984. In 1987, she completed her master degree. In 1984-1986, she has worked an architectural office in Trabzon. She completed PhD. thesis in 1994 at the same University. She worked in order to prepare conference, exhibition and competition at Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Architecture on different years and completed a European Commission-Leonardo Da Vinci Project in 2009 with her colleagues. The project‘s name is: “Designtrain: Training Tools for Developing Design Education”, and project’s web site is: www.designtrain-ldv.com. She still works as Prof. Dr. at Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Architecture-Department of Architecture and continues professional activities at the same university.
Ali Osman Asasoğlu Short Bio Karadeniz Technical University

Ali Osman Asasoğlu was born in 1960, in Ankara, Turkey. He graduated from Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Architecture, in 1985. In 1988, he completed her master's degree. He completed Ph.D. thesis in 1994 at Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Architecture. He worked in order to prepare conference, exhibition and competition at Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Architecture on different years and completed a European Commission-Leonardo Da Vinci Project in 2009 with her colleagues. The project‘s name is: “Designtrain: Training Tools for Developing Design Education”, and project’s website is: www.designtrain-ldv.com. In 2005, he served as the vice dean of the KTU Faculty of Architecture. Between 2012 and 2013, he served as Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Architecture at Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University. He still works as Prof. Dr. at Karadeniz Technical University, Faculty of Architecture-Department of Architecture and continues professional activities at the same university.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2023

Keywords:

context, design education, reading concepts, studio concepts, village institutes

Abstract

At a glance, architectural space or architectural product is the name given to the artificial shell of actions arising from human needs. These needs range from basic expectations, such as protection, shelter, and production which are necessary for human life, to expectations which require more complex intellectual infrastructure such as culture, belief, and lifestyle. In this study, possible intellectual, architectural approach and design method preferences in Village Institute buildings as architectural products are examined and their contributions to architectural project education are discussed through project work examples. Within the scope of the study, the understanding of education and architecture of the village institutes were examined and possible inferences and concepts which would form the basis of the design were tried to be determined with the help of publications in the literature focused on these subjects. Further, it is aimed to question the relationship of these concepts with those produced in the architectural project studio. The design study subject of the article was carried out in the 2018-2019 Fall Semester at the Department of Architecture at KTU. The first step in the process is turning the inferences and concepts obtained by the executives into a set of information which shall be, eventually, compared with the student project work. This set is retained by the executives for discussion in the article. The second step is the literature research of the students about the project topic and location. Each student reached some concepts from the field and Village Institutes where Trabzon/Beşikdüzü Village Institute was located in the past and advanced his/her design studies through these concepts. Within the scope of this article, the concept sets obtained by the executives and students were compared and discussions were made on overlaps and divergences by associating the aforementioned two steps, and a theoretical framework was formed which was graphically formed.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Akar, H., (2011). Türkiye’deki köy enstitülerinin toplumsal değişmedeki yeri, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eğitim Bilimleri Ana Bilim Dalı, Eğitim Programları ve Öğretim Programı, İzmir.
Arkitekt Cilt: 1941 Sayı: 1941/42-01-02 (121-122), 46-48, 3803 Sayılı Kanuna Tavfikan Ankara Hasanoğlan Köyü'nde Açılan Enstitünün Avam Projelerine Ait Müsabaka Şartnamesi, (1941).
Retrived from: http://dergi.mo.org.tr/dergiler/2/106/1179.pdf
Arkitekt, Haberler, Cilt: 1941, Sayı: 1941/42-03-04 (123-124), 98.
Retrived from: http://dergi.mo.org.tr/detail.php?id=2&sayi_id=107
Başaran, İ. E., (2004). Sistem kuramı ve köy enstitüsü, Yeniden İmece, Yıl 1, Sayı 2, Şubat, İzmir, 64-69.
Batır, B., (2012). Akpınar örneğinde bir aydınlanma projesi olarak köy enstitüleri, Samsun Sempozyumu, 13-16 Ekim, Editörler: Prof. Dr. Mahmut Aydın, Doç. Dr. Bekir Şişman, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Selahattin Özyurt, Yrd. Doç. Dr. Hasan Atsız, CİLT III, Samsun Valiliği, Samsun, 524-536.
Baykurt, F., (2021). Unutulmaz köy enstitüleri, Literatür Yayınları, 7. Basım, İstanbul.
Baysal, E., (2012). Köy enstitülerinde mekân kurgusu ve mimari yapılanma, Düşünen Tohum Konuşan Toprak, Cumhuriyetin Köy Enstitüleri, 1940-1954, Suna ve İnan Kıraç Vakfı İstanbul Araştırmaları Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 136-158.
Beyazova, P., (2012). Bauhaus geleneğine bakış, Sosyoloji Notları 9, Ocak-Şubat-Mart, Ankara, 33-38.
Çetin, S. & Kıran, G., (2019). Ortaklar köy enstitüsünde modern mimarlığın izleri, Journal of Arts, Cilt/Volume 2, Sayı/Issue 3, 169-180.
Çorakbaş, F., (2014). Mimari koruma perspektifinden ortaklar köy enstitüsü yerleşkesi ve Mualla Eyüboğlu, Ortaklar köy enstitüsü 70 yaşında, Birinci Basım, Yayına Hazırlayan: Prof. Dr. Kemal Kemal Kocabaş, İzmir, 105-116.
Çorakbaş, F., K. & Atalay, B., (2017). Beşikdüzü köy enstitüsü: mekansal hafızanın yıkımı, Tanıklıklarla Beşikdüzü Aydınlığı, Yayına Hazırlayan: Prof. Dr. Kemal Kemal Kocabaş, Yeni Kuşak Köy Enstitüler Derneği Yayınları, İzmir, 113-128.
Elpe, E., (2014). Köy Enstitüleri ve Sanat Eğitimi, Batman Üniversitesi Yaşam Bilimleri Dergisi; Cilt 4, Sayı 2.
Erzen J., (2009). Bauhaus’un 90. yılında, Mimarlık 349. Retrived from:
http://www.mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=363&RecID=2185#
Gazalcı, M., (2021). 21 Köy enstitüsü-çınarlar anlatıyor, Bilgi Yayınevi, Ankara.
Gezer, N., (2006). Köy enstitülerinde oluşmuş düşün kaynağının bugüne ulaşabilmesinin nedenleri ve sınanan gerçekleri, Yeniden İmece, Ağustos, 85-86.
Karakuş, M., (2017). Toplumsal bellek bağlamında mezunların anlatımıyla köy enstitüleri deneyimi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C. 18, S. 33, s. 719-741.
Kirby, F., (2019). Türkiye’de köy enstitüleri, Niyazi Berkes, (Çev.), 8. Baskı, İstanbul.
Köksal, D., (2009). Cumhuriyet ideolojisi ve estetik modernizm: baltacıoğlu, yeni zamanlar ve bauhaus, Bauhaus: Modernleşmenin Tasarımı/Türkiye’de Mimarlık, Sanat, Tasarım Eğitimi ve Bauhaus, A. Artun & E. Aliçavuşoğlu (Eds), İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, 241-261.
Köy Enstitüleri Kanunu. (1940) 22 Nisan 1940 tarihli ve 4491 sayılı Resmi Gazete.
Kocabaş, K., (2014). Aydınlanma yazıları, Yeni Kuşak Köy Enstitülüler Derneği, İzmir.
Makal, O., (2004). Şimdi Korunması Gereken Kültür Varlıkları, Yeniden İmece, Şubat, 21-28.
Özdemir, O., (2008). Köy enstitüleri ve yeni ortaçağın eğitim sorunu, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 46-54.
Özmen, M., (2004). Türk aydınlanmacılığı ve köy enstitüleri, Müdafaa-i Hukuk Dergisi, 69, 46.
Özsoy, S., (2008). Bir eğitim ütopyacısı: İsmail Hakkı Tonguç, Toplum ve Demokrasi, 2 (3), Mayıs-Ağustos, 267–276.
Saka, N. (2010). Köy enstitülerinin Türkiye’nin kalkınma sürecindeki yeri, (Yüksek Lisans Tezi) , İstanbul.
Şimşek, G., & Mercanoğlu, C., (2018). Bir ‘‘planlama örneği” olarak köy enstitüleri deneyimi, Planlama 28(3), 261-281.
Tonguç, İ. H., (1943). Köy enstitülerimizde eğitim ve öğretim ilkeleri, Ankara Üniversitesi, Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 5, 137-147.
Türkoğlu, P., (2000). Tonguç ve enstitüleri, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul.
Ülkü, C., (2008). Sanat eğitimi, sanat ve köy enstitüleri, Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 4, Sayı 1, 37-45.
Yıldız, N. & Akandere, O., (2017). Köy enstitülerinin ideolojik yapısı, Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Journal Of Modern Turkish History Studies, XVII/35 (Güz/Autumn), 275-316.
URL 1. https://www.ayamfolklor.com/aydinlanmanin-besigi-besikduzu-koy-enstitusu/
Venturi, R., (2019), Mimari kompozisyonda bağlam, Ülkü Özten (Ed)., Mimari bağlamsalcılık II, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Yayınları, No:329, Eskişehir.

Downloads

PDF

622

526

Published

2021-08-30

How to Cite

Kuloğlu, N., & Asasoğlu, A. O. (2021). Village institutes as a design approach. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2(2), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2023