Resilience in interior architecture education: Distance universal design learning in the COVID-19 pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i2022Keywords:
COVID-19, distance education, resilience, universal design learning, interior architectureAbstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected all levels of education all over the World. In Turkey, on March 16, 2020, the decision of distance education was taken in higher education sharply. This necessity had caused urgent adaptation to the distance education process, which resulted in changing the courses’ curriculums in parallel with the emergence of new teaching and learning strategies especially in applied programs such as interior architecture. This process has tested the ‘resilience’ of the education system explicitly. Resilience means an ability of a community, system, or individual to ‘adapt’ and ‘transform’ in the case of varied facts causing any disruptive situation in the existing system. The pandemic has taught the education community about ‘adaptation’ and ‘transformation’ through implementing diverse learning tools and responses to complex circumstances, especially in applied courses. With the end of the pandemic, the instructors experiencing the face-to-face education environment anew will sustain it with the lessons from the pandemic undoubtedly. This study aims to discuss the concept of ‘resilience’ with its basic dimensions, ‘adaptation’ and ‘transformation’, in interior architecture education by focusing on the experiences, limitations, and potentials experienced in the distance education process. It specifically dwells on teaching and learning experiences of Universal Design (UD) course conducted in the Department of Interior Architecture and Environmental Design, Atılım University, Ankara in the 2020 Spring term when the first and urgent adaptation to distance education had been experienced. The evaluation process is supported with the obtained qualitative data, with results suggesting that all students gained useful insights by experiencing multiple dialogue environments in various ways of learning into how they can incorporate inclusivity into future designs. This study displays that it is crucial that the distance UD learning process open to interactive dialogue among students, experts, instructors, and users to design inclusive spaces welcoming all people without discrimination. It argues that there have been potential improvements about adaptation and transformations of educational approaches within the pandemic, but in interior architecture education as applied design education, the importance and necessity of experiential learning in bodily and collective communication has been deeply proven.
Metrics
References
- Afacan, Y. (2011). Teaching universal design: An empirical research in interior architecture. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3185-3192.
- Altay, B. & Demirkan, H. (2014). Inclusive design: developing students' knowledge and attitude through empathic modelling. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(2), 196-217.
- Brogden, L. (2020). From product to process and site to system: Disaster resilience and humanitarian design in architecture education (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/202988/1/Elizabeth_Brogden_Thesis.pdf.
- Campos, P. (2020). Resilience, education and architecture: The proactive and “educational” dimensions of the spaces of formation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 43, pp. 1-11.
- Cassim, J. & Dong, H. (2007). Designer education: case studies from graduate partnerships with industry. In R. Coleman, J. Clarkson, H. Dong, J. Cassim (Eds.), Design for Inclusivity: A Practical Guide to Accessible, Innovative and User-Centred Design (1st ed., pp. 71–87). England: Gower.
- Cengizkan, A. (2021). Eğitim alanında “iletişmek” ve temel eksiklik: Beden dili ["Communicating" in the field of education and the main deficiency: Body language]. Yetkin Report. Retrieved from https://yetkinreport.com/2021/03/05/egitim-alaninda-iletismek-ve-temel-eksiklik-beden-dili/
- D’Souza, N. (2007). Design intelligences: A case for multiple intelligences in architectural design. International Journal of Architectural Research, 1(2), pp. 15-34.
- Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.
- Dinç Uyaroğlu, İ. (2015). Performance evaluation and design guidelines for equitable access of students with disabilities in university campus outdoor environments (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://open.metu.edu.tr/bitstream/handle/11511/25516/index.pdf.
- Dong, H. (2010). Strategies for Teaching Inclusive Design. Journal of Engineering Design, 21 (2-3), 237–251.
- Duschl, R. A. (2012). The second dimension—crosscutting concepts: Understanding a framework for K‐12 science education. Science and Children, 49 (6), 10-14.
- Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & Rockström J. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15 (4), 20.
- Gehl J. (2011). Life between buildings: using public space (6th ed.). Washington: Island Press.
- Helvacioglu, E. & Karamanoğlu N. N. (2012). Awareness of the Concept of Universal Design in Design Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 99-103.
- Heylighen, A., Van der Linden, V. & Van Steenwinkel, I. (2017). Ten questions concerning inclusive design of the built environment. Building and Environment, 114, 507-517.
- Imrie, R. (1996). Disability and the City: International Perspectives (1st ed.). London: SAGE.
- Imrie R. & Hall, P. (2001). Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments (1st ed.). London: Spon Press.
- Laboy F. & Fannon, D. (2016). Resilience Theory and Praxis: a Critical Framework for Architecture. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, 13(1), 39-53.
- Ostroff, E. (1997). Mining Our Natural Resources: The User as Expert. Innovation, the Quarterly Journal of the Industrial Designers Society of America, 16(1).
- Ostroff E. (2003). International design education strategies. In J. Clarkson, S. Keates, R. Coleman & C. Lebbon (Eds.), Inclusive Design. London: Springer.
- Ostroff, E. (2011). Universal Design: an Evolving Paradigm. In W. F. E. Preiser & E. Ostroff (Eds.), Universal Design Handbook (2nd ed., pp. 1.3-1.11). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Preiser, W. F. E. (2010). Toward universal design performance assessments. In W. F. E. Preiser & E. Ostroff (Eds.), Universal Design Handbook (2nd ed., pp. 38.1-38.8). New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Rutter, M. (1993). Resilience; some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health, 14(8), 626–631.
- Strickfaden, M., Devlieger, P., Heylighen, A. (2009). Building Empathy through Dialogue Design Connexity. In J. Malins (Eds.), Eighth International Conference of the European Academy of Design Conference, 8 (pp. 448 – 452). Scotland: The Robert Gordon University.
- Sungur Ergenoğlu, A. (2015). Universal design teaching in architectural education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1397 – 1403.
- Trogal, K., Bauman, I., Lawrence, R., & Petrescu, D. (2019). Introduction: architecture and resilience on a human scale. In K. Trogal, I. Bauman, R. Lawrence & D. Petrescu (Eds.), Architecture and resilience: a series of interdisciplinary dialogues (1st ed., pp. 16-28). New York: Routledge.
- Tutal, O. (2016). Yaşlılık, Yaşam Çevresi ve Evrensel Tasarım [Ageing, Sheltering and Universal Design]. In V. Kalınkara (Eds.), Disiplinlerarası Yaklaşım, Sorunlar, Çözümler-2 (1st ed., pp. 489-502). Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
- UNDRR (2021). Resilience. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Retrieved from https://www.undrr.org/terminology/resilience
- Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R. & Kinzig A. (2004). Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-Ecological Systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.
- Waxman, H. C, Gray, J. P. & Padron, Y. N. (2003). Review of Research on Educational Resilience. UC Berkeley: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7x695885
- WHO (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
- Yılmaz, M. (2018). Public Space and Accessibility. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 6, 1-14.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 İlkay Dinç Uyaroğlu
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.