Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011

Keywords:

architectural education, non-formal education, summer school, workshop

Abstract

Over the last fifteen years, apart from compulsory curricular studios, extracurricular intensive studios in architectural design (ISAD) have become a mainstream educational environment worldwide. ISADs cover an actual weight in non-formal architectural education. However, to date, there is no review on the methods, processes, or implementation of extracurricular ISADs. The field needs to enhance the visibility of workshop results with regular reporting of workshop activities to raise awareness among future professionals and the wider public. This review aims to make visible existing learning-teaching-experiencing environments and pedagogical conditions, practices, tendencies, and implementations in ISADs. The study follows three stages. It first conducts a scoping study to examine the research outputs on ISADs indexed in SCOPUS and Web of Science from January 1975 to September 2020. Second, it expands the workshop pool by including past ISADs reached via websites/papers. It codes each workshop with the codes and themes determined through the scoping study. Finally, it creates an interactive mapping detailing the following analysis: (1) Quantitative analysis of ISADs (Geographical distribution; outputs; principles, as elements creating the atmosphere and tactics); (2) Qualitative analysis to reveal the impact of workshop outputs on the interested stakeholders. The review suggests that ISADs, including their processes and outputs, contribute to the knowledge triangle in architecture by serving two fundamental roles: (1) A research-by-design activity to address socio-economic-ecological problems caused by the built environment; (2) A pioneering venture in improving the curriculum and practices of teaching and learning. Within the scope of the exigencies of the education field, this review uncovers the potential of ISADs in overcoming time-related, geographical, economic limitations; providing fresh perspectives on content and methods concerning architectural education; expanding the intellectual resources of students; enabling international collaboration between HEIs; breeding an experimental/flexible learning and research environment in the 1st and 2nd cycles to absorb ever-changing tools/methods promoted in professional/research sides of the field. This review provides the reader with an array of diverse teaching and learning practices on these non/informal grounds. The number of workshops included in this study is relatively small, therefore, researchers are encouraged to expand the number of workshops for further analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Işıl Ruhi Sipahioğlu, TOBB University of Economics and Technology

    Işıl Ruhi Sipahioğlu, Architect, is a lecturer at TOBB University of Economics and Technology, Department of Architecture. She received her bachelor’s degree in architecture from Gazi University (2005); her master’s degree in architecture from Middle East Technical University (METU) (2008); and her Ph.D. degree in Building Environment and Technology Program at Politecnico di Milano (2013). At TOBB ETU, she teaches the final architectural design and works on research projects on Architectural Education and climate change. Her research interests include sustainable building design and assessment and architectural education.

  • Günsu Merin Abbas, TOBB University of Economics and Technology

    Günsu Merin Abbas, a full-time lecturer at TOBB ETU, Dept. of Architecture, holds a B.Arch. from Izmir University of Economics (2011) and M.Arch. from METU (2014), where she conducts her Ph.D. studies. In line with her studies, she has also taken part in office practice focusing on hospital and institutional building projects, as well as a number of international freelance projects focusing on computational façade design. Her research interests are design computing, performative architectural design, tooling, and emergent technologies. Günsu teaches 2nd year drawing and representation courses by employing BIM and performative design tools and aims at implementing BIM and performative design understanding to the existing curricula, as well as elective courses on computational design.

  • Burçin Yılmaz, Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e)

    Burçin Yılmaz graduated from the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture in Gazi University in 2010. During her bachelor, she took part in several workshops and carried out internships in various design offices in Ankara. After her Bachelor, as a profession, she worked at design offices for two years and established her own company in 2012. She acquired her master’s degree at TOBB University of Economics and Technology in 2017. Thereafter, she taught as an adjunct staff in the design studio courses at TOBB ETU. Currently, she is developing her doctoral research in the department of the Built Environment at Eindhoven University of Technology.

References

Balaid, A., Abd Rozan, M. Z., Hikmi, S. N., & Memon, J. (2016). Knowledge maps: A systematic literature review and directions for future research. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.005

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brooks-Harris, J. E., & Stock-Ward, S. R. (1999). Workshops: Designing and facilitating experiential learning. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Cabral Filho, J. dos S. (2005). Digital Art-A Field of Inquiry for Contemporary Architecture. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 3(3), 355–372. https://doi.org/10.1260/147807705775377276

Ciravoğlu, A. (2003). Mimari tasarım eğitiminde formel ve enformel çalışmalar üzerine [On formal and informal studies in architectural design education]. Yapı, 257, 43–47.

Couceiro da Costa, M., Formiga, B. & Abbas, G. M. (Eds.) (2019). Materiality as a process. Caleidoscopio.

Diniz, N. (2015). The anatomy of a prototype: Situating the prototype and prototyping on design conceptual thinking. In L. Combs & C. Perry (Eds.), Computational ecologies : design in the anthropocene : ACADIA 2015, October 19-25, Cincinnati_Ohio: exhibition catalog of the 35th annual conference of the Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture (ACADIA) (pp. 323-332). ACADIA. http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/acadia15_323.pdf

Doyle, S., Forehand, L., Hunt, E., Loughrey, N., Schneider, S., & Senske, N. (2018). Cyborg sessions: A case study for gender equity in technology. In T. Fukuda, W. Huang, P. Janssen, K. Crolla & S. Alhadidi (eds.), Learning, adapting and prototyping - Proceedings of the 23rd CAADRIA Conference (pp. 71–80). The Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA). http://papers.cumincad.org/data/works/att/caadria2018_259.pdf

Ernst, S., & Edwards, A. (2013). Reducing risk and promoting sustainability in the foothills of the Himalayas: A Pedagogy for Teaching and Practicing Sustainable Development. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 7(3), 93–107.

Fernandez-Antolin, M.-M., del Rio, J. M., & Gonzalez-Lezcano, R.-A. (2020). The use of gamification in higher technical education: Perception of university students on innovative teaching materials. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09583-0

Garcia Saez, M. S., Tomas Marquez, S., La Spina, V., Mileto, C., & Vegas Lopez-Manzanares, F. (2016). Learning by doing of traditional construction techniques: Gypsum flooring. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), INTED2016 Proceedings (pp. 1684–1689). IATED.

Guner, A. F., Benli, G., Karacar, P., & Kasapseckin, M. A. (2017). Design-build workshops in architectural education: A case study, adobe bus stop in northern cyprus. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN17 Proceedings (pp. 6868–6876). IATED.

Habraken, N. J. (2006). Questions that will not go away: Some remarks on long-term trends in architecture and their impact on architectural education. Open House International, 31(2), 12–19.

Hardy, M. (2008). Experiments in traditional building, architecture and urbanism education: INTBAU’s recent work. In S. Roaf & A. Bairstow (Eds.), Oxford Conference: A Re-evaluation of education in architecture (pp. 405–410). WIT Press.

Jimenez Delgado, A., & Piedecausa-Garcia, B. (2013). Teaching-learning process of historical heritage: A journey as a beginning, path and end. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN13 proceedings (pp. 5321–5326). IATED.

Kahvecioglu, H., Erdem, A., & Paker-Kahvecioglu, N. (2002). Short term workshop: An alternative strategy in architectural design education. In D. Marjanovic (Ed.), DESIGN 2002: Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference, Vols 1 and 2 (pp. 997–1001).

Karadağ, D., & Tuker, C. (2020). A proposal for a computational design and ecology based approach to architectural design studio. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09594-x

Kuyrukcu, Z., & Kuyrukcu, E. Y. (2015). An educational tool the importance of informal studies/studios in architectural design education: A workshop summary. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 2666-2673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.950

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

MATERIART (2020). Art and Science of Materiality in Architectural Design Education. https://www.materiart.org

Milovanovic, A., Kostic, M., Zoric, A., Dordevic, A., Pesic, M., Bugarski, J., Todorovic, D., Sokolovic, N., & Josifovski, A. (2020). Transferring COVID-19 challenges into learning potentials: Online workshops in architectural education. Sustainability, 12(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177024

Momirski, L. A. (2019). Urban design workshops in the education curriculum: Advantages and disadvantages. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 471(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/10/102048

Orhan, M. (2017). The role and importance of workshops in the architectural design education; Case of “Self Made Architecture I-II. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3, 131–136. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjhss.v3i3.1545

Paszkowski, Z. W., & Gołebiewski, J. I. (2020). International design workshops as an intensive form of architectural education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(1), 51–56.

Pereira, S. M., & Roche, J. (2016). Across disciplinary and national borders: A pedagogical tool for reuse. In A. Tostoes & Z. Ferreira (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Docomomo Conference - Adaptive Reuse: The Modern Movement Towards the Future (pp. 854–860). Docomomo.

Polatoğlu, Ç., & Vural, M. (2012). As an educational tool the importance of informal studies/studios in architectural design education; Case of walking İstanbul 1&2. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.684

Ruhi Sipahioğlu, I., & Alanlı, A. (2020). A Threshold in-between Education and Profession: The Final Architectural Design Studio. In N. Çağlar, I. G. Curulli, I. Ruhi Sipahioğlu, & L. Mavromatidis (Eds.), Thresholds in Architectural Education. Wiley-ISTE. doi:10.1002/9781119751427.ch7

Ruhi Sipahioğlu, I., Öztoprak, Z., Yılmaz, B., & Çağlar, N. (2020). The Dialogy of Architectural Design Studio and Learning Milieux. In V. Trova & I. Lykourioti (Eds.), Materiality in the architectural studio process: Good practices (pp. 36-53). Caleidoscópio.

Ruhi Sipahioğlu, I., Abbas, G.M., & Sönmez, B. (2021). Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. [Visualization]. https://public.tableau.com/views/OutsidetheschoolAreviewofthenon-formalshort-termarchitecturalworkshops/FINALSTORY?:language=en&:display_count=y&:origin=viz_share_link

Sas-Bojarska, A., & Rembeza, M. (2020). International architectural-urban-landscape design workshops to strengthen students’ education, capabilities and mobility. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 18(2), 190–196.

Shatarova, R. (2015). The commune as an alternative learning experience in architectural education: The case of EASA (European Architecture Students Assembly). In F. Uslu (Ed.), ADVED 15: International Conference on Advances in Education and Social Sciences Abstracts & Proceedings (pp. 730–740). Ocerint Publishing.

Shi, X., Fang, X., Chen, Z., Phillips, T. K., & Fukuda, H. (2020). A didactic pedagogical approach toward sustainable architectural education through robotic tectonics. Sustainability, 12(5), 1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051757

Smatanová, K., & Dubovcová, A. (2016). Workshop as a tool in architectural education. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 14(1), 123–128.

Sorguç, A. G., Yemiscioglu, M. K., & Ozgenel, C. F. (2019). A computational design workshop experience for 21st century architecture education. In J.P. Sousa, G.C. Henriques & J.P. Xavier (Eds.), ECAADE SIGRADI 2019: Architecture in the age of the 4th industrial revolution (pp. 127–136). eCAADe. https://doi.org/10.5151/proceedings-ecaadesigradi2019_353

Symans, M., Mistur, M., & Danziger, B. (2010, June). Facilitating collaboration of engineering and architecture students via an international travel-study workshop [Paper presentation]. 2010 Annual Conference & Exposition, Louisville, Kentucky.

Tang, G. (2013). Timber gridshells: Beyond the drawing board. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Construction Materials, 166(6), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1680/coma.12.00046

Tanyeli, U. (2013). Why Cannot (Even) Architectural Education Be Flexible in Turkey? In S. Lökçe, O. Turan, & B. B. Hisarligil (Eds.), MIMED Forum IV: Flexibility in Architectural Education (pp. 77–88). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

The European Parliament and of the Council of the European Union. (2013). Directive 2013/55/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, 132–170.

Topcu, U., Taberna, J., & Hofert, K. (2015). A visual tale of two cities: Video as a tool for representation through informal learning. In D. Garcia-Escudero & B. Bardi i Mila (Eds.), III workshop on educational innovation in architecture (JIDA’15) (pp. 255–265). UPC.

Topcu, Umran, & Taberna Torres, J. (2018). Multicultural education in Barcelona. In L.G. Chova, A.L. Martinez & I.C. Torres (Eds.), 12TH INTED proceedings (pp. 2777–2785). IATED.

Turgut, H., & Cantürk, E. (2015). Design workshops as a tool for informal architectural education. Open House International, 40(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2015-B0012

Twardoch, A., & Stangel, M. (2016). Beyond the university: Socially engaged student’s workshops on public space and housing. In M. Perinkova & M. Nedved (Eds.), 8th Architektura v Perspektiv 2016 (pp. 23–25). Technicka univerzita Ostrava.

Tzaka, A., Kalogirou, N., Papakostas, G., & Symeonidou, I. (2010). SKG IN_FLUX: An urban `process-plan’. In G. Schmitt, L. Hovestad, L. VanGool, F. Bosche, R. Burkhard, S. Coleman, J. Halatsch, M. Hansmeyer, S. KonsorskiLang, A. Kunze & M. SehmiLuck (Eds.), ECAADE 2010: Future cities (pp. 107–114). ETH Zurich; Autodesk; BASF; Bentley; IBM.

Tzonis, A. (2014). Architectural education at the crossroads. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(1), 476–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.01.001

Ucci, M., Law, S., Andrews, R., Fisher, A., Smith, L., Sawyer, A., & Marmot, A. (2015). Indoor school environments, physical activity, sitting behaviour and pedagogy: A scoping review. Building Research & Information, 43(5), 566–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2015.1004275

UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. (2012). UNESCO Guidelines on the Recognition, Validation and Accreditation of the Outcomes of Non-formal and Informal Learning. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000216360_eng

Berg, H.v.d. (2008). (Re-)building communities: A case study in architectural education. Open House International, 33(2), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-02-2008-B0010

Yang, J. (2015). Recognition, validation and accreditation of non-formal and informal learning in UNESCO member states. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-29

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Outside the school: A review of the non-formal short-term architectural workshops. (2021). Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 2(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2021.v2i1011