A discussion on child-friendly cities through a critique on the experience of the body

Authors

  • Nevset Gul Canakcioglu Assist. Prof. Dr. Ozyegin University, Turkey

    Nevset Gul Canakcioglu, obtained her B.Sc. degree in architecture in 2002, M.Sc. degree in 2011 with the dissertation titled “Analysis of Perceptual Processes of Children Living in Different Settled Social Groups in Istanbul by the Method of Cognitive Maps” and her Ph.D. degree in 2016, from Istanbul Technical University with the dissertation titled “Analysis of Perceptual Processes of Individuals Using Paediatric Healthcare Spaces by the Method of Cognition and Space Syntax”. Worked in various architecture offices and construction companies as technic office architect and project coordinator, participated in a number of architectural project competitions both individually and with different teams. She worked at Istanbul Okan University as a research assistant in 2011-2012. She has published nationally and internationally. Her research focuses on paediatric healthcare environments, spatial perception in children, cognition, behaviour maps, cognitive maps and space syntax in her academic studies. She currently teaches in the Faculty of Architecture and Design at Istanbul Ozyegin University.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2020.v1i1005

Keywords:

bodily experience, children's play, environmental psychology, home zone, woonerf

Abstract

Social changes resulting a significant shift in philosophical thinking in the renaissance brought the idea of individuality to the forefront, radically changing the social requirements and desires of individuals, the ideas of freedom of all individuals collectively, their relations with society and their environments, and also their participation in urban life. As a result of the industrialization activities, wars and migrations experienced in the twentieth century, this direct participation of the individual in the urban space was negatively affected. Especially due to globalization, the changing physical appearance and quality of life of metropolitan cities have created disconnections in human interactions with the city and their bodily experience with the environment. Monetary system which have dominated urban life, has taken business life to the forefront separating the residential fabric from the zones where business life develops, and accordingly lively streets have been surrendered to motor vehicles over time.

One of the social groups most affected by these changes, is the young generation. The cities where the scale has changed radically, the sacrificed areas were usually the recreational environments, and children's play areas. Within this context, it is also mentioned in the literature that adults (politicians, planners, and municipalities) easily ignore the fact that cities are also for children; the developmental characteristics of young people, their needs for age, play and experience necessary for their healthy growths are ignored.

Therefore, it should be admitted that cities should have a lot to offer children. It is necessary to organize the streets, to plan the transit routes of motor vehicles, redefine new speed limits, and re-evaluate the streets to make them pedestrian-friendly again taking into account the possibility of danger to children. So, as a part of the theoretical background discussed in the context of environment and behavior theories, the debate covers how the urbanites, children in particular –every urbanite is considered as a body in this paper– are affected by the rapid change of urban space.

Also, through the introduction of global models such as woonerf and home zone on how the city can regulate physical and social components that can contribute both to the socialization of adults and to children’s development and freedom in relation to their own age and needs, a fruitful insight is endeavored to be provided to the potential for these kinds of practices to be implemented in metropolitan cities especially in the residential fabric of cities.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Akarsu, B., 1994. Çağdaş Felsefe, Kant’tan Günümüze Felsefe Akımları, İnkılap, İstanbul.
  • Akgün, T. D., (2010). Karma işlevli yapıların kentsel ve mimari tasarım arakesitinde kamu yararı gözetilerek irdelenmesi: Zincirlikuyu-Levent Aksı örneği, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Institute of Science and Technology, İstanbul Technical University, Turkey.
  • Appleyard, B., Cox, L. (2006). At home in the zone. Planning, 72(9).
  • Ben-Joseph, E. (1995). Changing the residential street scene: Adapting the shared street (woonerf) concept to the suburban environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 61(4), 504-515.
  • Berkün, S. (2019). Çocuk Dostu Kent Yönetimlerinin Çocuklar Tarafından Değerlendirilmesi: Bursa Örneği. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(1), 135-152.
  • Bettleheim, B. (1987) The importance of play, The Atlantic Monthly, 259, pp. 35–42.
  • Biddulph, M. (2012). Street design and street use: comparing traffic calmed and home zone streets. Journal of urban design, 17(2), 213-232.
  • Bilgin, M., 2006. Karma İşlevli Yapılı Merkezlerin Kent ve Günlük Yaşam İçersisindeki Yeri: İstanbul’dan Örnekler, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  • Churchman, A. (2003). Is there a place for children in the city? Journal of Urban Design, 8(2), 99-111.
  • Collarte, N. (2012). The Woonerf Concept “Rethinking a Residential Street in Somerville”. Master of Arts in Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning, Tufts University, Cambridge.
  • Collarte, N. (2014). The American Woonerf: Creating Livable and Attractive Shared Streets, Doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, MA, USA.
  • David, T.G., Weinstein, C.S. (1987). Built Environments and Children’s Development, In C.S. Weinstein, T.G. David, (Eds.), Spaces for Children, (pp. 3-18.) New York: Plenum Press.
  • UK Department for Transport (2005). “Home Zones.” London: Department for Transport.
  • Dicle, A. (1983). Gecekondu: The problems of internal migration and squatter settlements in Turkey. Journal of South Asian and Middle Eastern Studies 6(3) pp.48-61.
  • Dudek, J. (2019). Design Guidelines for Creating a Vital Woonerf Street. International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geo Conference: SGEM, 19(6.2), 433-440.
  • Geniş, Ş. (2007). Producing elite localities: the rise of gated communities in Istanbul. Urban studies, 44(4), 771-798.
  • Gill, T. (2006). Home zones in the UK: history, policy and impact on children and youth. Children Youth and Environments, 16(1), 90-103.
  • Guttenberg, A. Z. (1982). How to crowd and still be kind-The Dutch Woonerf. Humboldt Journal of Social Relations, 100-119.
  • Jacobs, J. (2011). The uses of sidewalks: safety. In R.T. Le Gates, F. Stout, (Eds.), The City Reader, 105-109, Routledge, New York.
  • Jacobs, J., 1992. The Death and Life of Great American Cities, Vintage Books, A Division of Random House, Inc., New York.
  • Keyder, Ç., (2009). Arka Plan, In Ç. Keyder (Ed.), İstanbul Küresel ile Yerel Arasında, 9-40, Metis, Istanbul.
  • Kraaij, A., Mooij, H. (2010). Plan Documentation: of the Woonerf. DASH| Delft Architectural Studies on Housing, (03), 73-75.
  • Kubat, A. S. (2019). Exploring the Fringe-Belt Phenomenon in a Multi-Nuclear City: The Case of Istanbul.ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, [S.l.], v. 7, p. 95-134, ISSN 2147-9380. Available at: <http://iconarp.ktun.edu.tr/iconarp/article/view/386>. Date accessed: 23 dec. 2020. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.83.
  • Kurtulus, H. (2011). Gated communties as a representation of new upper and middle classes in Istanbul, Journal of Faculty of Political Science, 44, 49-65.
  • Layfield, R., Chinn, L., & Nicholls, D. (2003). Pilot home zone schemes: evaluation of The Methleys, Leeds. Wokingham, UK: Transport Research Laboratory.
  • Moussavi, F., (2010). Biçimin İşlevi (Trans. P.Derviş), YEM, İstanbul.
  • Noe, A., (2004). Action in Perception, MIT Press, USA.
  • Merlau-Ponty, M. (2010). Algılanan Dünya, (Trans. Ö. Aygün), Metis, İstanbul.
  • Preston, B. (1995). Cost Effective Ways to Make Walking Safer for Children and Adolescents, Injury Prevention, 1: 187-190.
  • Riggio, E. (2002). Child friendly cities: good governance in the best interests of the child. Environment and Urbanization, 14(2), 45-58.
  • Spencer, C. & Woolley, H. (2000) Children and the city: a summary of recent environmental psychology research, Child: Care, Health and Development, 26(3), pp. 181–198.
  • Tandoğan, O. (2014). Çocuk İçin Daha Yaşanılır Bir Kentsel Mekan: Dünyada Gerçekleştirilen Uygulamalar. Megaron, 9 (1).
  • Tas, H.I. and Lightfoot, D.R. (2005). Gecekondu Settlements in Turkey: Rural—Urban Migration in the Developing European Periphery, Journal of Geography, 104(6), pp.263-271.
  • Tilly, A., Webster, D., & Buttress, S. (2005). Pilot home zone schemes: evaluation of Northmoor, Manchester. Wokingham, UK: Transport Research Laboratory.
  • Topsümer, F., Babacan, E., Baytekin, E. P. (2009). Şehir ve çocuk: Çocuk dostu şehir girişiminin şehir imajına katkısı. İstanbul Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi| Istanbul University Faculty of Communication Journal, (35), 5-20.
  • UNCRC (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child, Retrieved from: https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx in Dec. 23rd, 2020.
  • United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), April 2018. Child Friendly Cities and Communities Handbook. Retrieved from: https://www.unicef.org/eap/reports/child-friendly-cities-and-communities-handbook, in Nov. 29th, 2020.
  • Url-1 Tekirdağ’da 1. Çocuk Festivali Başladı, Retrieved from: https://www.haberler.com/tekirdag-da-1-cocuk-festivali-basladi-haberi/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-2 Çocuk Dostu Kent Antalya, Retrieved from:
  • https://www.sabah.com.tr/akdeniz/2013/10/19/cocuk-dostu-kent-antalya in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-3 Karaman İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü "Çocuk Dostu Okul Projesi" Kapsamında Öğrencileri Ağız Taramasından Geçirdi. Retrieved from: https://www.haberler.com/karaman-da-cocuk-dostu-okul-projesi-haberi/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-4 Sağlık Bakanlığı yetkilileri Konya’da inceleme yaptı. Retrieved from: https://www.konyakent.com/saglik-bakanligi-yetkilileri-konya-da-inceleme-yapti/1549/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-5 Kırşehir'de İl Özel İdare Müdürlüğü Kaynaklarıyla, Nüfusu Yüksek Olan Köylere Çocuk Parkları Yapılacağı Bildirildi. Retrieved from:
  • https://www.sondakika.com/haber/haber-koylere-park-projesi-hayata-gececek/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-6 Kayseri Valiliği'nce yürütülen Çocuk Dostu Şehir Projesi kapsamında oluşturulan web sitesinin hizmet vermeye başladığı bildirildi. Retrieved from: https://www.haberler.com/kayseri-de-cocuk-dostu-sehir-projesi-web-sitesi-haberi/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-7 Büyükşehir Belediyesi, çocukları medya ile buluşturuyor. Retrieved from: https://www.haberler.com/buyuksehir-belediyesi-cocuklari-medya-ile-2385179-haberi/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-8 Beslenme Dostu Okul Projesi. Retrieved from: https://sivasism.saglik.gov.tr/TR,112347/beslenme-dostu-okul-projesi.html in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-9 Sokak ligi İzmir’de buluşuyor. Retrieved from: https://www.izmir.bel.tr/tr/Haberler/sokak-ligi-izmirde-bulusuyor/2733/156 in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-10 Bursa’nın uzay yolculuğu başladı, Retrieved from:
  • http://www.bursabilimmerkezi.org/kategori/haberler-13/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • Url-11 Çocuk Belediyesi dünyaya model., Retrieved from: http://seferihisar.bel.tr/cocuk-belediyesi-dunyaya-model/ in Dec. 20th, 2020.
  • van Gameren, D., & Mooij, H. (2018). The Heritage of the Woonerf. DASH| Delft Architectural Studies on Housing, (03), 18-29.
  • von Leyden, W. (1962, January). Cogito, ergo sum. In Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Vol. 63, pp. 67-82, Aristotelian Society, Wiley.
  • Wegenstein, B., 2006. Making Room for the Body: From Fragmentation to Mediation, In M. Flanagan, A. Booth (Eds.), Re-skin, MIT Press, USA.
  • Werner, C. M., Altman, I. (2000). Humans and nature: insights from a transactional view. In S. Wapner, J. Demick, T. Yamamoto, H. Minami (Eds.), Theoretical Perspectives in Environment-Behavior Research Underlying Assumptions, Research Problems and Methodologies, pp.21-37, Springer, Boston, MA.

Downloads


Published

2020-12-29 — Updated on 2020-12-30

Versions


How to Cite

Canakcioglu, N. G. (2020). A discussion on child-friendly cities through a critique on the experience of the body. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 1(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2020.v1i1005 (Original work published December 29, 2020)

Issue


Section

Research Articles