A reading of 'place attachment' in spatial perception: The case of KTU department of architecture

Authors

  • Zafer İslam Taşdemir image/svg+xml Karadeniz Technical University

    Zafer İslam TAŞDEMİR completed his undergraduate degree (2019) at the European University of Lefke (EUL) Faculty of Architecture. He is currently continuing his master's degree in the Department of Architecture at Karadeniz Technical University (KTU). Major research interests include space psycholog and space experience, phenomenology in architecture.

  • Aslıhan Öztürk image/svg+xml Karadeniz Technical University

    Aslıhan Öztürk received her B.Arch (2013), MSc. (2016) and PhD (2022) degrees in architecture from Karadeniz Technical University (KTU), Faculty of Architecture. During her doctorate, she conducted research on her subject at Michigan State University on a scholarship for 9 months. In addition, she received 3 months of vocational training in London. She currently works as an assistant professor with a doctorate at Karadeniz Technical University. Major research interests include space psychology, emotions, and space experience, phenomenology in architecture.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i3144

Keywords:

Edward Relph, place attachment, place, space, spatial perception

Abstract

The concept of space, the fundamental object of architecture, is perceived through sensory experiences, with prior spatial experiences playing a significant role in this process. Cultural diversity leads to variations in the spatial behavior of societies in different geographies, meaning that individuals experiencing the same structure may connect space, meaning, and place in diverse ways. This research builds upon Edward Relph’s Place and Placelessness, which examines the phenomenological dis-course on "how places are experienced and how they change." It focuses on the concept of "place attachment," defined as the emotional, cognitive, and behavioral bond formed at the intersection of the experiencing body and the experienced space. The Architecture Department at KTU, recognized for its accessibility and its role in training students proficient in architectural terminology and skilled in designing future spaces, has been selected as the focus of this study. The research aimed to derive semantic interpretations of the physical, emotional, and social dimensions of place, following the three categories Relph used in his analysis of place. A semi-structured interview technique with predetermined open-ended questions was employed, and participants were asked to create memory maps based on the building plan. Data analysis provided insights into how users perceived the study area, identifying spaces where a sense of attachment was strong. Conversely, areas perceived as "non-places," evoking a sense of being "out of place," were highlighted. Suggestions were offered for improving such negative spaces and guiding future research.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Ar, M. (2021). A review on the concepts of space, place and incongruity. Journal of City and Civilisation, 14, 8-25.
  • Augé, M. (2017). None places, (Trans. T. Ilgaz) Istanbul. Diamon Publishing House.
  • Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., & Ercolani, A. P. (1999). Multidimensional perception of residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in the urban environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 331-352.
  • Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Placing commitment in a revitalising neighbourhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 23(3), 259-271.
  • Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (1985). Social connectedness, territoriality, and holiday decorations: The influence of dead-end streets. Environment and Behaviour, 17(5), 539-565.
  • Canter, D. (1977). Book review of E. Relph's book, 'location and unplaceness'. Environment and Planning.
  • Chow, K., & Healey, M. (2008). Place attachment and place identity: First-year undergraduates making the transition from home to university. Journal of Enviromental Psychology, 28(4), 362-372.
  • Cresswell, T. (2004). Place-a brief introduction. Wiley.
  • Fried, M. (2000). Continuities and discontinuities of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 193-205.
  • Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuto (Eds.), Psychological Theories for Environmental Issues (pp.137-170). Farnham: Ashgate.
  • Harris, P. B., Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (1996). Privacy regulation and place attachment: Predicting attachments to a student family housing facility. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16, 287-301.
  • Heidegger, M. (2018). Being and time, (Trans. K. Ökten) Istanbul. Alfa Basım Publishing House.
  • Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M. E., & Hess, S. (2007). Place attachment and identity to natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology , 27(4), 310-319.
  • Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). The place suffix: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273-281.
  • Hummon, D. M. (1992). Community attachment: Local feeling and sense of place. Human Behavior & Environment: Advances in Theory & Research, 12, 253-278.
  • Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lake shore owners' attitudes toward their property. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233-248.
  • Kasarda, J. D., & Janowitz, M. (1974). Community attachment in mass society. American Sociological Review, 39, 328-339.
  • Knez, I. (2005). Attachment and identity as related to a place and its perceived climate. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 207-218.
  • Kyle, G., Graefe, A., & Manning, R. (2005). Testing the dimensionality of place attachment in recreational settings. Environment and Behaviour, 37(2), 153-177.
  • Lalli, M. (1992). Urban-related identity: Theory, measurement and empirical findings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(4), 285-303.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). Critique of everyday life. Volume 1, (Trans. J. Moore). London.
  • Lewicka, M. (2005). Ways to keep people active: The role of place attachment, cultural capital and neighbourhood ties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 381-395.
  • Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335-350.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. New York: Humanities Press.
  • Mesch, G. S., & Manor, O. (1998). Social ties, environmental perception and local attachment. Environment and Behaviour, 30(4), 504-519.
  • Moser, G., Ratiu, E., & Fleury-Bahi, G. (2002). Appropriation and interpersonal relationships. Environment and Behavior, 34(1), 122-136.
  • Ng, S. H., Kam, P. K. W., & Pong, R. W. M. (2005). People living in ageing buildings: Their quality of life and sense of belonging. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, s. 347-360.
  • Norberg-Schulz, C. (1971). The space and architecture of existence. London: Studio Vista.
  • Özgen, N. (2020). Basic concepts in behavioural geography. In Ö. Nurettin, & S. Coşkun, Behavioural Geography (pp.1-46). Ankara: Pegem Publications.
  • Pretty, G. H., Chipuer, H. M., & Bramston, P. (2003). Sense of place among adolescents and adults in two rural towns in Australia: Distinctive features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 273-287.
  • Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self identity. Environnement and Behaviour, 10(2), s.147-169.
  • Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K., & Kaminoff, R. (2014). Place identity: The physical world socialisation of the self (1983). People, place and space reader (pp. 77-81). Routledge.
  • Relph, E. (1976). Place and unlocality. Pion: London
  • Rollero, C., & De Piccoli, N. (2010). Place attachment, identification and environment perception: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(8), 198-205.
  • Seamon, D. (2000). Phenomenology, place, environment and architecture, a review of the literature.
  • Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and unplaceness, Edward Relph. Key texts in human geography.
  • Sharifi, A., & Yamagata, Y. (2016). On the suitability of assessment tools for guiding communities towards disaster resilience. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 18, 115-124.
  • Shumaker, S. A., & Taylor, R. B. (1983). Towards a clarification of human-place relations: The place attachment model. In NR Feimer & ES Geller (Eds), Environmental Psychology. Directions and Perspectives, New York.
  • Smaldone, D., Harris, C., & Sanyal, N. (2005). An exploration of place as a process: The case of Jackson Hole. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 397-414.
  • Stedman, R. (2003). Sense of place and forest science: Toward a program of quantitative research.
  • Steele, F. (1981). Sense of place. Boston, Massachusetts: CBI Publishing.
  • Steg, L., van den Berg, A. E., & De Groot, J. I. M. (2015). Environmental psychology: An introduction. Çevre Psikolojisi/ Çeviri: L. K. Cicerali ve E.E. Cicerali. Nobel Yayıncılık.
  • Stokols, D., & Shumaker, S. A. (1981). People in places: A transactional view of settings. P. 441–448 in Harvey, D. (Ed.). Cognition, Social Behavior, and the Environment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 608 pp.
  • Trentelman, C. K. (2009). Place attachment and community attachment: A primer based on the lived experience of a community sociologist. Community and Natural Resources, 22(3), 191-210.
  • Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Space and place: Perspectives on experience. Minneapolis: Minnesota.
  • Tuan, Y. F. (2000). Space and place: An experience perspective. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). Place and identity processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 205-220.
  • Usta, G. (2020). Semantic analyses of space and place concepts. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 10(1), 25-30.
  • Yaşaroğlu, C. (2017). The structure of spatial conservation: A Turkish adaptation study. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2810-2817.
  • Yuen, B. (2005). Searching for places identity in Singapore. Habitat İnternational, 29(2), 197-214.

Downloads


Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Taşdemir, Z. İslam, & Öztürk, A. (2024). A reading of ’place attachment’ in spatial perception: The case of KTU department of architecture. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 5(3), 477–495. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2024.v5i3144

Issue


Section

Research Articles