An overview of fringe belt literature through studies from different perspectives

Authors

  • Ezgi Küçük Çalışkan Marmara Municipalities Union

    Dr. Ezgi KÜÇÜK ÇALIŞKAN is the Urban Planning Coordinator at Marmara Municipalities Union. She graduated from Izmir Institute of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Department of City and Regional Planning. She holds a master's in Urban Design from Istanbul Technical University. She received a Ph.D. in Urban and Regional Planning at Istanbul Technical University, with her dissertation dealing with property relations in urban fringe belt areas. Her academic studies continue at the Turkish Network of Urban Morphology.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4i2090

Keywords:

cross-cultural studies, different perspectives, fringe belt, literature

Abstract

The fringe belt phenomenon, which was conceptually put forth by Herbert Luis in 1936, developed by M.R.G. Conzen starting from 1960, and placed on a historico-geographical basis in the context of urban rent theories by J.W.R. Whitehand, has been studied by researchers with different perspectives in cities developed with distinct socio-economic and cultural dynamics in various parts of the world. This paper aims to reveal how the fringe belt concept, which emerged within the Conzenian tradition of urban morphology turn into a phenomenon, has been handled from the time it first appeared to the present, to examine the contribution of different perspectives to the fringe belt literature and to present suggestions for the development of the concept. Selected from peer-viewed journals and academic conferences, 53 different fringe belt studies were examined according to their publication periods, within the framework of spatial, economic, social, and planning perspectives previously discussed by Ünlü (2013) as well as the ecological perspective. In this context, the selected studies are examined based on the case areas, methodology, and main findings on fringe belt formation and change. Property perspective is discussed as a hybrid approach in fringe belt studies. Finally, further research proposals are emphasized in order to realize the fringe belt phenomenon as durable and sustainable urban spaces.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  • Al-Ashab, K. H. (1974). The urban geography of Baghdad. (PhD thesis). University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Erişim: http://hdl.handle.net/10443/1059.
  • Barke, M. (1974). The changing urban fringe of Falkirk, Scottish Geographical Magazine. 90(2), 85-97.
  • Barke, M. (1976). Land Use Succession: A Factor in Fringe-Belt Modification. The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers), 8(4), 303-306.
  • Barke, M. (1982) Beyond the Urban Growth Map: Suggestions for More Analytical Work in Urban Morphology, Teaching Geography, 7(3), pp. 111-115.
  • Barke, M. (1990). Morphogenesis, fringe belts and urban size: an exploratory essay. T.R. Slater (Ed.). The built form of Western cities. (279-297). Leicester: Leicester University Press.
  • Camiz, A. & Bruccoleri A. (2015). Morphology of the urban organism in Cyprus. The effect of borders and political changes in the fringe belts of Girne, TRNC. proceedings of 22nd International Seminar on Urban Form, (1481-1488). Rome.
  • Carter, H. & Wheatley, S. (1979). Fixation lines and fringe belts, land uses and social areas: nineteenth century changes in the small town. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers NS 4, 214-38.
  • Chen, C. & Lin W. (2014). Morphological process as an instrument for knowing chronological character: a case study in Tainan. Oliveira, V. et al. (Eds). ISUF 2014: Our common future in Urban Morphology / 21st International Seminar on Urban Form. 21st International Seminar on Urban Form: ISUF 2014, Porto (FEUP).
  • Cihanlı, G., Küçük Çalışkan, E., Kubat, A. S. (2022). Morfolojik Bölgeler ve Çeper Kuşak Alanları Üzerinden Bir Okuma: İstanbul Yedikule Örneği. TNUM III. Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, (413-435). ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi
  • Conzen, M. P. (2009). How cities internalize their former urban fringes: a cross-cultural comparison. Urban Morphology 13(1), 29-51.
  • Conzen, M. P. & Gu, K., Whitehand J. W. R. (2012). Comparing Traditional Urban Form in Chine and Europe: A Fringe-Belt Approach. Urban Geography 33(1), 22-45.
  • Conzen, M. R. G. (1960). Alnwick: Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis. Institute of British Geographers Publication 27. Londra.
  • Conzen, M. R. G. (1969). Alnwick, Northumberland: a study in town-plan analysis, Institute of British Geographers Publication 27, 2nd publication, Institute of British Geographers, Londra.
  • Çakmak, E., Belli, B., Kubat, A. S. (2022). Üsküdar’ın Çeper Kuşak Gelişim Süreci. TNUM III. Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, (1077-1098). ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
  • Del Monaco, A. I. (2015). Old-new studies on city limits and fringe belts. Expanding-shrinking urban events. Brief notes on the internal and external frontiers in Chinese and African cities and on a new European limes on the Mediterranean Sea. proceedings of 22nd International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF), Roma.
  • Deputla, M. (2014). Polish city from Conzenian perspective – fringe belt phenomenon in Torun. Oliveira, V. et al. (Eds). ISUF 2014: Our common future in Urban Morphology / 21st International Seminar on Urban Form. 21st International Seminar on Urban Form: ISUF 2014, Porto (FEUP).
  • Ducom, E. (2005). Fringe belts in French cities: Comparative study of Rennes, Nantes, Tours. Approaches in Urban Geography, Newcastle Upon Tyne: Northumbria University Publication.
  • Ducom, E. (2008). Fringe-belt analysis in France: A Conzenian approach to urban renewal. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.
  • Geddes, I. (2014). From ‘a miserable town of 150 mud houses’ to ‘the city that never sleeps’: the transformation of Limassol’s urban form over the past 200 years. Oliveira, V. et al. (Eds). ISUF 2014: Our common future in Urban Morphology / 21st International Seminar on Urban Form. 21st International Seminar on Urban Form: ISUF 2014, Porto (FEUP).
  • Gu, K. (2010). Exploring the fringe belt concept in Auckland: An urban morphological idea and planning practice. New Zealand Geographer, 66, 44-60.
  • Gu, K., Whitehand, J. W. R., Whitehand, S. (2015). Urban morphogenetic grain: extending fringe-belt research in China. proceedings of 22nd International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF), Roma.
  • Günay, B. (1999). Property Relations and Urban Space. METU Faculty of Architecture Press, Ankara.
  • Harvey, D. (2009). Sosyal Adalet ve Şehir. M. Moralı (Çev.). Metis Yayınları.
  • Hazar, D. & Kubat, A. S. (2015). Fringe belts in the process of urban planning and design: Comparative analyses of Istanbul and Barcelona. ITU A|Z, 12(1), 53-65.
  • Hazar, D. & Kubat, A. S. (2016). The fringe belt development process of Istanbul. proceedings of 23rd International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF), Nanjing.
  • Hazar, D. & Özkan, S. P. (2020). Çeper Kuşakların Kamusal ve Ekolojik Değeri: İzmir Askeri Aalanlar Örneği. Kent Akademisi 13(1), 10-21.
  • He, S. (2018). Exploring the fringe-belt phenomenon in a Sino-Portuguese environment: the case of Macao. Urban Morphology, 22(1), 35-52.
  • Hopkins, M. I. W. (2012). The ecological significance of urban fringe belts. Urban Morphology, 16(1), 41-54.
  • Karaulan, D. & Kubat, A. S. (2018). Analyzing Fringe Belt Phenomenon in The Historico-Geographical Structure of Milan, Italy. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 6(2), 304-332. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2018.56
  • Kropf, K. & Malfroy, S. (2013). What is urban morphology supposed to be about? Specialization and the growth of a discipline. Urban Morphology, 17(2), 128-131.
  • Kubat, A. S. (2019). Exploring the Fringe-Belt Phenomenon in a Multi-Nuclear City: The Case of Istanbul. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning 7, 95-134. https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2019.83
  • Kubat, A. S., Ünlü T., Kuru, Ö. (2022). Tarihi Yarımada İç Çeper Kuşak Alanlarının İncelenmesi: Konstantin Surları. TNUM III. Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, (397-412). ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi
  • Küçük Çalışkan, E. (2023). Çeper Kuşak Alanlarının Gelişiminde ve Dönüşümünde Mülkiyet Perspektifi: İstanbul İncelemesi. (PhD thesis). İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
  • Küçük Çalışkan, E. & Kubat, A. (2021). Policies and facts for mega-urbanization: middle and outer fringe belt developments of Istanbul. ISUF 2020 Virtual Conference Proceedings, 1. doi:10.26051/0D-4S8D-08CR
  • Küçük Çalışkan, E., Kubat, A. S. (2022a). İstanbul Sanayi Alanları Dönüşümlerinin Çeper Kuşak Analizi ile İzlenmesi. TNUM III. Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, (1099-1113). ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
  • Küçük Çalışkan, E. & Kubat, A. S. (2022b). Tracking Morphological Agencies in the Alienated Fringe Belt Plots of Istanbul. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 10(2), 711-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15320/ICONARP.2022.222
  • Lammers, D. & Roders, A. P., Wesmael, P. (2015). Radial fringe-belt formation. proceedings of 22nd International Seminar on Urban Form. Rome, 1495-1506.
  • Lammers, D. & Roders, A. P., Wesmael, P. (2017). Future scenarios for post-industrial Eindhoven. A fringe-belt perspective. proceedings of 24th International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF), Valencia.
  • Larkham, P. J. (1998). Urban Morphology and Typology in the United Kingdom.
  • Lefebvre, H. (2014). Mekânın Üretimi. Işık Ergüden (Çev.), Sel Yayıncılık.
  • Logunova, E. (2017). Morphological evolution of the fringe-belts of Krasnoyarsk. proceedings of 24th International Seminar on Urban Form (ISUF), Valencia.
  • Marques de Sousa Safe, S. & de Alvarenga Pereira Costa, S. (2017). Fringe belt analysis: A method for confirming the establishment of the historical boundaries of Rabat. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Geographica Socio-Oeconomica, 25, 39-62.
  • Meneguetti, S. K. & Pereira Costa, S.A. (2015). The fringe-belt concept and planned new towns: a Brazilian case study. Urban Morphology, 19(1), 25-33.
  • Monaco, A. I. (2015). Old-New studies on City limits and Fringe belts. Expanding-Shrinking urban events. Brief notes on the internal and external frontiers in Chinese and African cities on a new European limes on the Mediterranean Sea. proceedings of 22nd International Seminar on Urban Form, Rome, 1485-1494.
  • Openshaw S. (1974) A Theory of the Morphological and Functional Development of the Townscape in an Historical Context, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Department of Geography, Seminar Papers, Number 24.
  • Šćitaroci, M. O., Marić, M. (2019). Morphological characteristics of green spaces in fortified towns and cities. Urban Morphology, 23(1), 27-44.
  • Simão and Costa (2014). Tranformation of the fringe belt units at the perimeter of Avenida do Contorno/Belo Horizante/MG. Oliveira, V. et al. (Eds). ISUF 2014: Our common future in Urban Morphology / 21st International Seminar on Urban Form. 21st International Seminar on Urban Form: ISUF 2014, Porto (FEUP).
  • Soygüzeloğlu, B., Kubat, A. S. (2022). Tarihsel Süreçte Çeper Kuşak Alanlarının Analizi: Taksim-Pera Örneği. TNUM III. Kentsel Morfoloji Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, (437-454). ODTÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi.
  • Ünlü, T. (2013). Thinking about Urban Fringe belts: A Mediterranean Perspective. Urban Morphology, 17(1), 5-20.
  • Ünlü, T. & Baş, Y. (2016). Multi-nuclear growth patterns in a rapidly changing Turkish city: a fringe-belt perspective. Urban Morphology, 20(2), 107-21.
  • Ünlü, T. & Baş, Y. (2019). The Urban Growth and Development Periods of Turkish Cities: A Fringe-Belt Perspective. B. Ö. Sarı (Ed.). Urban and Regional Planning in Turkey. (107-128). Springer.
  • Ünlü, T. (2022). Urban Fringe Belts: Roots, Developments and Prospects. Journal of Urban Research and Development, 3(1), 4-15.
  • Vilagrasa, J. (1990). The fringe-belt concept in a Spanish context: the case of Lleida. Slater T. R. (Ed.) in The Built Form of Western Cities. (300-318). Leicester University Press.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (1967). Fringe belts: a neglected aspect of urban geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41, 223-33.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (1972a). Building cycles and the spatial pattern of urban growth. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 56, 39-55.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (1972b). Urban-rent theory, time series and morphogenesis: an example of eclecticism in geographical research. Area, 4(2), 215-222.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (1977). The basis for an historico-geographical theory of urban form. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 2(3), Change in the Town (1977). 400-416.
  • Whitehand, J.W.R. (1981). Background to the urban morphogenetic tradition. J.W.R. Whitehand (Ed.) The Urban Landscape: Historical Development and Management Institute of British Geographers Special Publication 13 içinde, 1-24. Academic Press, London.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (1988). Urban fringe belts: development of an idea. Planning Perspectives, 3(1), 47-58.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (1994). Development Cycles and Urban Landscapes. Geography, 79(1), 3-17.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (2001). British urban morphology: the Conzenian tradition. Urban Morphology, 5(2), 3-10.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. & Morton, N. J. (2003). Fringe belts and the recycling of urban land: an academic concept and planning practice. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 819-39.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. & Morton, N. J. (2004). Urban morphology and planning: the case of fringe belts. Cities, 21(4), 275-289.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. & Morton, N. J. (2006). The fringe belt phenomenon and socioeconomic change. Urban Studies, 43, 2047-66.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (2011). Issues in urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 16(1), 55-65.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R., Gu, K., Whitehand, S. (2011). Fringe belts and socioeconomic change in China. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 38, 41-60.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R., Gu, K., Conzen, M. P., Whitehand, S. M. (2014). The typological process and the morphological period: a cross-cultural assessment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 41, 512-533.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. & Gu, K. (2017) Urban fringe belts: evidence from China. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(1), 80-99.
  • Whitehand, J. W. R. (2019). Green space in urban morphology: a historico-geographical approach. Urban Morphology, 23(1), 5-17.
  • Zhang, Y. (2019). A spatio-temporal study of fringe belts and urban green spaces in Birmingham, UK. Urban Morphology, 23(1), 27-44.

Downloads


Published

2023-08-30

How to Cite

Küçük Çalışkan, E. (2023). An overview of fringe belt literature through studies from different perspectives. Journal of Design for Resilience in Architecture and Planning, 4(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.47818/DRArch.2023.v4i2090

Issue


Section

Research Articles